The Diagnostic Performance of Nuchal Translucency Alone as a Screening Test for Down Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract

Background. Down syndrome or trisomy 21, the most common chromosomal disorder, results from the presence of a third copy of chromosome 21 and manifests as mild to moderate intellectual disability, growth retardation, congenital heart defects, gastrointestinal abnormalities, and characteristic facial features. Several methods have been used to screen for Down syndrome in the prenatal period, such as ultrasound, biomarkers, cell-free DNA testing, and combinations of these tests. A positive result from one or more of these screening tests signals the need for confirmatory karyotyping to clinch the diagnosis. Ultrasound between 11 to 14 weeks of gestation can evaluate nuchal translucency (NT) to screen for Down syndrome. During the second trimester, a triple or quadruple test can also be performed alone or in addition to NT to quantify Down syndrome risk. In limited resource settings however, only the measurement of NT via ultrasound can be performed since biomarker tests are either unavailable or inaccessible. While the diagnostic performance of NT measurement alone has been investigated in several observational studies, there is no consensus on its performance as a sole test to screen for Down syndrome.

Objective. To determine the diagnostic performance of NT during prenatal first-trimester ultrasound as a screening test for Down syndrome.

Methods. We performed a systematic search on the PubMed, ProQuest, and Cochrane Library databases for recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses that addressed the objective. The existing reviews found were then independently appraised by the two reviewers with the AMSTAR-2 checklist. To update the existing reviews, a systematic search was done in the same databases to identify additional primary diagnostic studies, which were appraised using the QUADAS-2 tool. Random-effects univariate meta-analysis and summary receiving operator curve (HSROC) analysis for the outcomes were performed using Review Manager version 5.4 and R version 4.2.2, respectively. Subgroup analysis was performed by stratifying the baseline risk of mothers for fetal anomaly as low- or high-risk. Highrisk mothers were defined as women with risk factors such as advanced age, positive serum screen, presence of other ultrasound anomalies, and history of previous fetus with anomaly.

Results. We found 22 cohort studies (n=225,846) of women at low-risk for fetal anomaly. The pooled sensitivity was 67.8% (95% CI: 61.4%-73.6%, I2=70.4%) and specificity was 96.3% (95% CI: 95.5%-96.9%, I2=96.7%). For low-risk women, the overall certainty of evidence was low, due to different modes of verification and heterogeneity not completely explained by variability in baseline risk or cut-points. Seven studies (n=9,197) were on high-risk women. The pooled sensitivity was 62.2% (95% CI: 54.1%-69.7%, I2=38.8%) and specificity was 96.5% (95% CI: 93.6%-98.1%, I2=95.5%). For women at high-risk, the evidence was rated as moderate due to differential verification.

Conclusion. Our analysis showed that NT measured through first-trimester ultrasound is specific for Down syndrome but has low sensitivity. Despite this, it is a useful screening test for Down syndrome in low-resource settings where other strategies may not be available or accessible. Furthermore, interpretation of NT results must take into consideration its limited sensitivity as this may lead to missed cases.