Socio-Cultural Perspectives of Child Discipline and Child Abuse in the Philippines
Abstract
Objectives. This study used a descriptive, qualitative design to explore the local understanding of child discipline and analyze the important link between parental discipline and child abuse.
Methods. Focus group discussions and key informant interviews were conducted with parents, children, local leaders, and professionals in 6 rural communities in the Philippines. The respondents were asked which corrective behaviors they would consider acceptable or abusive to children by showing them a list of disciplinary acts.
Results. The results showed an adequate understanding of the purpose and intent of child discipline. Children are generally disciplined to teach them good values, mold and shape their characters and equip them with a moral sense of right and wrong. Child discipline is considered already harmful if: the child sustains physical injuries and psychological pain; the disciplinary action is not commensurate to the offense committed by the child and is used frequently and repetitively, without any valid reason; when sensitive body parts such as the head are involved, and when the disciplinary action is not appropriate to the age, gender, physical and mental status of the child. Among the various types of disciplinary acts, counseling, beating or spanking, and withdrawing or reducing school allowance were considered most acceptable. Hanging, burning, and scalding were the most unacceptable or abusive disciplinary behaviors. Compared to parents, professionals, and local leaders, children were more lenient as they regarded certain inappropriate behaviors by adults as somewhat tolerable.
Conclusion. Despite having an adequate understanding of the purpose and intent of child discipline, there is still a need to educate parents, children, and local leaders about when a disciplinary act becomes harmful to children. Community stakeholders should also be informed about how and where to report the abuse once it is identified.
