Facility Assessment for the Implementation of the Philippine Package of Essential Noncommunicable Disease Interventions (PhilPEN) in Primary Health Care Centers in Metro Manila

Authors

  • Joyce P. Parco, MPH Institute of Human Nutrition and Food, College of Human Ecology, University of the Philippines Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines
  • Kim Leonard G. dela Luna, RND, MSPH, PhD Department of Nutrition, College of Public Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines
  • Maria Theresa M. Talavera, DrPH Institute of Human Nutrition and Food, College of Human Ecology, University of the Philippines Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47895/amp.vi0.13653

Keywords:

primary health care, noncommunicable diseases, delivery of health care, standard of care, cardiovascular disease

Abstract

Background and Objective. The Philippine Package of Essential Noncommunicable Disease Interventions (PhilPEN) was introduced by the Department of Health through AO 2012-0029. This is anchored to WHO PEN, a prioritized set of cost-effective interventions that can be carried out to provide an acceptable standard of care at the primary health care level, even in low-resource settings. The study aims to evaluate the availability and adequacy of primary health care facilities in providing the PhilPEN package of interventions using the WHO assessment tool. 

Methods. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 25 randomly selected primary health care facilities in Metro Manila. Data were collected through structured interviews with facility staff and direct observation using a standardized questionnaire aligned with PhilPEN and WHO PEN guidelines. The tool assessed PhilPEN inputs (infrastructure, human resources, basic tools and equipment, essential medicines, record-keeping, financing) and services (risk assessment and screening, early diagnosis and monitoring, treatment and follow-up, counseling, referral of patients). 

Results. All facilities met the basic standards for infrastructure, human resources, record keeping, and financing. However, only 40% had all essential medicines, and just 16% had complete tools, including urine ketone/protein test strips. Risk assessment and patient counseling were consistently implemented, but early diagnosis and follow-up services were inconsistent due to training and supply gaps. 

Conclusion. Primary health care centers in Metro Manila demonstrate partial readiness for PhilPEN implementation. Gaps in tools, medicines, and protocol availability should be addressed to optimize NCD service delivery.

References

Downloads

Published

01/29/2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Facility Assessment for the Implementation of the Philippine Package of Essential Noncommunicable Disease Interventions (PhilPEN) in Primary Health Care Centers in Metro Manila. Acta Med Philipp [Internet]. 2026 Jan. 29 [cited 2026 Apr. 17];60(6). Available from: https://actamedicaphilippina.upm.edu.ph/index.php/acta/article/view/13653

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

11-20 of 490

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.