RAPID REVIEW
Is
Abigail F. Melicor, MD1 Katrina Loren R. Rey, MD2 and Leonila F. Dans, MD2,3
1Asia Pacific Center for Evidence Based Healthcare, Manila, Philippines
2Department of Clinical Epidemiology, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila
3Department of Pediatrics, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila
KEY FINDINGS
Asymptomatic and
•Manifestations of
•As of June 2020, only 586 (2.8%) of the 20,990 active cases in the Philippines were classified as asymptomatic, but it is unclear whether cases are
•Based on 36 observational studies (case reports, case series,
•Studies on viral load comparing symptomatic cases with
•There was no difference in the transmission rates of symptomatic and asymptomatic cases. However, the estimated infectivity and probability of transmission was higher for symptomatic cases compared to asymptomatic cases, but results were imprecise due to a wide confidence interval.
•The World Health Organization (WHO) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recognize the possibility of
Copyright Claims: This review is an intellectual property of the authors and of the Institute of Clinical Epidemiology, National Institutes of
BACKGROUND
Manifestations of
The true prevalence of asymptomatic and pre- symptomatic infections is unknown. Based on a retrospective review of 2,143 pediatric patients with
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA |
1 |
Is
Diamond Princess Cruise ship was 17.9% (95%CrI: 15.5– 20.2%) but this may be underreported due to testing priority given to symptomatic patients.3 A review on the prevalence of asymptomatic infections reported it may be as high as 40% to 45% based on 3 cohorts with representative sample in Iceland, USA and Italy.4 In the Philippines, as of June 2020, only 586 (2.8%) of the 20,990 active cases were classified as asymptomatic. It is not clear, however, if these cases are carriers (asymptomatic) or still in the incubation period of the disease
The true burden of
This rapid review summarized the available evidence on asymptomatic and
METHODS
An electronic search of Medline, Central and Google scholar was done for published and unpublished studies on asymptomatic or
Screening and selection of studies were done by two independent reviewers based on the following inclusion criteria:
•Population:
•Exposure: asymptomatic transmission,
•Outcomes:
•Study designs: observational studies (e.g. cohort, case- control,
The quality of the included studies was assessed by two reviewers. The
The following data were extracted from the included studies: title, author, study design, country, population and key findings.
RESULTS
Characteristics of Included Studies
A study done in Singapore investigated all
A study in China on a cluster of young people (aged 16 to 23 years old) in January 2020 reported 7
2 |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA |
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
Is
Eleven other different cluster studies in separate publications (9 in China, 1 in Taiwan, 1 in Germany) of
Asymptomatic Transmission (11 observational studies and 2 statistical models)
Five case series in China suggested that asymptomatic
A study by Chen et al. reported surveillance data from January 20 to March 6, 2020 in Ningbo City, China out of 191 cases identified, 30 (15.7%) were asymptomatic. For the asymptomatic cases, six out of the 146 (4.11%) close contacts tested positive for
for the risk of infection (p = 0.288). Exclusion of index cases with very high transmission rates also showed no significant difference in the transmission rates of the symptomatic and asymptomatic cases (p = 0.84). Timing of contact with symptomatic cases to determine if
Of the 279
One study reported on
Viral Shedding in Asymptomatic cases (11 studies)
Although asymptomatic transmission was not documented in 4 case series,
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA |
3 |
Is
and/or throat swabs of asymptomatic cases which suggests the potential of these patients to transmit the
A nursing facility in Washington, USA reported that 23 residents were positive for
In contrast, a study in China among 31 virologically- confirmed
(p = 0.027 for difference over first 19 days) and were less likely to test positive for the
In a cohort of 199
Serial interval from modelling studies (7 studies)
From four modelling studies conducted in China, Japan, Germany, Singapore and Brunei, the estimated mean serial interval from onset of symptoms of the index case to onset of symptoms of the secondary case were shorter than the reported incubation period of
37% (95% CI:
Critical Appraisal
Available evidence included 4 case reports, 27 case series and 7 cohort studies with small sample size. Because studies were contact tracing from known
4 |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA |
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
Is
decreased the transmission of infection from asymptomatic and
In one Chinese study, the risk ratio for infectivity and probability of transmission was higher for symptomatic cases compared to asymptomatic cases, however the results were imprecise due to a wide confidence interval.The symptomatic cases had
Although the modelling studies had larger sample size, these estimates may be affected by healthcare systems, recall bias,
Ongoing studies
There are seven ongoing clinical trials on asymptomatic transmission of
Recommendations from other guidelines
The CDC and WHO report that current evidence has documented
CONCLUSION
Asymptomatic and
symptomatic cases is unclear with conflicting results reported by different studies. Hence, more high quality studies are needed to validate these findings and determine the extent of asymptomatic and
Declaration of conflict of interest
No conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
1.World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease 2019
2.Dong Y, Mo X, Hu Y, Qi X, Jiang F, Jiang Z, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of 2143 pediatric patients with 2019 coronavirus disease in China. Pediatrics. 2020 Mar. doi:
3.Mizumoto K, Kagaya K, Zarebski A, Chowell G. Estimating the asymptomatic proportion of coronavirus disease 2019
4.Oran DP, Topol EJ. Prevalence of asymptomatic
5.Department of Health. Beat
6.Lai CC, Liu YH, Wang CY, Wang YH, Hsueh SC, Yen MY, et al. Asymptomatic carrier state, acute respiratory disease, and pneumonia due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-
7.Wei WE, Li Z, Chiew CJ, Yong SE, Toh MP, Lee VJ. Presymptomatic Transmission of
2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020 Apr;
8.Huang L, Zhang X, Zhang X, Wei Z, Zhang L, Xu J, et al. Rapid asymptomatic transmission of
9.Mahapure KS, Kulkarni NS. Asymptomatic transmission of severe acute respiratory
10.Gao Y, Shi C, Chen Y, Shi P, Liu J, Xiao Y, et al. A cluster of the Corona Virus Disease 2019 caused by incubation period transmission in Wuxi, China. J Infect. 2020
11.Ye F, Xu S, Rong Z, Xu R, Liu X, Deng P, et al. Delivery of infection from asymptomatic carriers of
12.Li C, Ji F, Wang L, Wang L, Hao J, Dai M, et al. Asymptomatic and
13.Qian G,Yang N, Ma AHY,Wang L, Li G, Chen X, et al. A
14.Cai J, Sun W, Huang J, Gamber M, Wu J, He G. Indirect Virus Transmission in Cluster of
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA |
5 |
Is
15.Tong ZD, Tang A, Li KF, Li P, Wang HL, Yi JP, et al. Potential Presymptomatic Transmission of
16.Yu P, Zhu J, Zhang Z, Han Y. A familial cluster of infection associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating possible
17.Liu YC, Liao CH, Chang CF, Chou CC, Lin YR. A locally transmitted case of
18.Rothe C, Schunk M, Sothmann P, Bretzel G, Froeschl G, Wallrauch C, et al. Transmission of
19.Jiang Y, Niu W, Wang Q, Zhao H, Meng L, Zhang C. Characteristics of a family cluster of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus
2in Henan, China. J Infect. 2020 Aug;
20.Li P, Fu JB, Li KF, Liu JN, Wang HL, Liu LJ, et al. Transmission of
21.Chen M, Fan P, Liu Z, Pan R, Huang S, Li J, et al. A
22.Zhang J, Tian S, Lou J, Chen Y. Familial cluster of
23.Su L, Ma X, Yu H, Zhang Z, Bian P, Han Y, et al. The different clinical characteristics of corona virus disease cases between children and their families in China - the character of children with
24.Hu Z, Song C, Xu C, Jin G, Chen Y, Xu X, et al. Clinical characteristics of 24 asymptomatic infections with
11.doi:
25.Bai Y, Yao L, Wei T, Tian F, Jin DY, Chen L, et al. Presumed asymptomatic carrier transmission of
26.Qiu C, Deng Z, Xiao Q, Shu Y, Deng Y, Wang H, et al. Transmission and clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in 104 outside- Wuhan patients, China. J Med Virol. 2020Oct;
27.Wong J, Jamaludin SA, Alikhan MF, Chaw L. Asymptomatic transmission of
28.Chen Y, Wang AH, Yi B, Ding KQ, Wang HB, Wang JM, et. al. Epidemiological characteristics of infection in
29.Yin G, Jin H. Comparison of transmissibility of coronavirus between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients: Reanalysis of the Ningbo
30.He D, Zhao S, Lin Q, Zhuang Z, Cao P, Wang MH, et. al. The relative transmissibility of asymptomatic
31.Wang Y, Yong H, Tong J, Qin Y, Xie T, Li, J, et. al. Characterization of an asymptomatic cohort of
32.Park SY, Kim YM, Yi S, Lee S, Na BJ, Kim CB, et. al. Coronavirus disease outbreak in Call Center, South Korea. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;
33.Gao M, Yang L, Chen X, Deng Y, Yang S, Xu H, et al. A study on infectivity of asymptomatic
34.Lucar J, Navalkele B, Becker BP, Reed CD, Parham J. Healthcare personnel exposure to a patient with asymptomatic
35.Jiang XL, Zhang XL, Zhao XN, Li CB, Lei J, Kou ZQ, et. al. Transmission potential of asymptomatic and paucisymptomatic
36.Lavezzo E, Franchin E, Ciavarella C,
37.Zou L, Ruan F, Huang M, Liang L, Huang H, Hong Z, et. al. SARS-
38.Kam KQ, Yung CF, Cui L, Lin Tzer Pin R, Mak TM, Maiwald M, et al. A Well Infant with Coronavirus Disease 2019
39.Le TQM, Takemura T, Moi ML, Nabeshima T, Nguyen LKH, Hoang VMP, et al. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 shedding by travelers, Vietnam, 2020. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;
40.Wan R, Mao ZQ, He LY, Hu YC, Chen W. Evidence from two cases of asymptomatic infection with
41. |
ijid.2020.03.041 |
KM, Arons M, James A, Taylor J, Spicer K, et |
Kimball A, Hatfield |
||
|
al. Asymptomatic and presymptomatic |
|
|
residents of a |
|
|
Washington, March 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 |
|
42. |
Apr; |
|
Arons MM, Hatfield |
KM, Reddy SC, Kimball A, James A, Jacobs JR, |
|
|
et. al. Presymptomatic |
skilled nursing facility. N Engl J Med. 2020 May;
43.Zhou R, Li F, Chen F, Liu H, Zheng J, Lei C, et al. Viral dynamics in asymptomatic patients with
44.Kim SE,Jeong HS,Yu Y,Shin SU,Kim S,Oh TH,et.al.Viral kinetics of
45.Chau NVV, Lam VT, Dung NT, Yen LM, Minh NNQ, Hung LM, et al. The natural history and transmission potential of asymptomatic
46.Noh JY, Yoon JG, Seong H, Choi WS, Sohn JW, Cheong HJ, et al. Asymptomatic infection and atypical manifestations of
46.doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2020.05.035.
47.Jiang X, Luo M, Zou Z, Wang X, Chen C, Qiu J. Asymptomatic
48.He X, Lau EHY, Wu P, Deng X, Wang J, Hao X, et. al. Temporal dynamics in viral shedding and transmissibility of
49.Nishiura H, Linton NM, Akhmetzhanov AR. Serial interval of novel coronavirus
6.doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.02.060.
50.Du Z, Xu X, Wu Y, Wang L, Cowling BJ, Meyers LA. Serial interval of
51.Tindale LC, Coombe M, Stockdale JE, Garlock ES, Lau WYV, Saraswat M,
6 |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA |
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
Is
C. Transmission interval estimates suggest
52. Wong J, Abdul Aziz ABZ, Chaw L, Mahamud A, Griffith MM, Lo YR, et al. High proportion of asymptomatic and presymptomatic
53.Chun JY, Baek G, Kim Y. Transmission onset distribution of
54.Ganyani T, Kremer C, Chen D, Torneri A, Faes C, Wallinga J, et al. Estimating the generation interval for
55.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Interim Clinical Guidance for Management of Patients with Confirmed Coronavirus Disease
56.World Health Organization. Transmission of
APPENDICES
Appendix 1. Literature search
Database |
Search strategy / search terms |
Medline |
(asymptomatic transmission) AND (("Coronavirus Infections"[Mesh] |
|
OR "Coronavirus"[Mesh] OR coronavirus OR novel coronavirus |
|
OR NCOV OR |
|
covid19 OR covid 19 OR |
|
syndrome coronavirus 2" [Supplementary Concept] OR severe |
|
acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 OR SARS2 OR SARS |
|
2 OR SARS COV2 OR SARS COV 2 OR |
Date and time |
Results |
|
of search |
Yield |
Eligible |
June 15, 2020 |
368 |
40 |
11:15:00 GMT+8
CENTRAL |
asymptomatic transmission OR asymptomatic carrier AND |
June 15, 2020 |
240 |
0 |
|
coronavirus 19 |
11:51:00 GMT+8 |
|
|
Google Scholar |
asymptomatic transmission, COVID 19 |
April 7, 2020 |
1220 |
5 |
|
Filter: 2019 |
12:02:00 GMT+8 |
|
|
Trial Registries |
|
|
|
|
ClinicalTrials.gov |
asymptomatic transmission, COVID 19 |
June 15, 2020 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
08:30:00 GMT+8 |
|
|
Chinese Clinical Trial Registry |
asymptomatic, transmission, COVID 19 |
June 15, 2020 |
6 |
2 |
|
|
08:20:00 GMT+8 |
|
|
Appendix 2. Critical Appraisal of Included Cohort Studies
|
|
Selection |
|
Compa- |
|
Outcome |
|
|
||
|
Representative- |
Selection of |
Ascertain- |
Outcome of |
Assessment |
|
||||
Study |
rability |
Total |
||||||||
ness of exposed |
ment of |
interest not |
of outcome |
of outcome |
of follow- |
|||||
|
★★ |
|
||||||||
|
cohort (★) |
cohort (★) |
exposure (★) |
present (★) |
(★) |
(★) |
up (★) |
★★★★ |
||
Wang 2020 |
– |
– |
★ |
– |
– |
★ |
★ |
★ |
||
Kimball 2020 |
– |
– |
★ |
– |
– |
★ |
★ |
★ |
★★★★ |
|
Arons 2020 |
– |
– |
★ |
– |
– |
★ |
★ |
★ |
★★★★ |
|
Zhou 2020 |
– |
– |
★ |
– |
– |
★ |
★ |
★ |
★★★★ |
|
Kim 2020 |
– |
– |
★ |
– |
– |
★ |
★ |
★ |
★★★★ |
|
Nguyen 2020 |
– |
– |
★ |
– |
★ |
★ |
★ |
★ |
★★★★★ |
|
Noh 2020 |
– |
– |
★ |
– |
– |
★ |
★ |
★ |
★★★★ |
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA |
7 |
Is
Appendix 3. Characteristic of Included Studies
No. |
Title/Author |
Study design |
Country |
Population |
Key findings |
1 |
Presymptomatic |
Case series |
Singapore |
All cases in Singapore from January to March 16 were included. |
|
|
Transmission of SARS- |
|
|
(n=243) |
Seven clusters of cases were identified with |
|
|
|
|
transmission as most likely reason for secondary cases. 10 of 243 |
|
|
January |
|
|
|
cases (4.1%) were identified in these clusters and accounted for |
|
2020 |
|
|
|
6.4% of 157 locally acquired cases. |
|
Wei W, Li Z, Chiew C, |
|
|
|
Limitations |
|
Yong S, Toh M, Lee V |
|
|
|
Other unknown source may have initiated the clusters |
|
|
|
|
|
Recall and interviewer bias |
|
|
|
|
|
Underdetection of asymptomatic illness |
2 |
Rapid asymptomatic |
Case series |
China |
Contacts of |
22 contacts of the index case |
|
transmission of |
|
|
index case from |
were identified. |
|
|
|
Wuhan |
7 contacts were |
|
|
the incubation period |
|
|
|
classmates) |
|
demonstrating |
|
|
|
|
|
strong infectivity in a |
|
|
|
Patient 1 (index case): 22/M, arrived from Wuhan Jan 19, |
|
cluster of youngsters |
|
|
|
developed symptoms (fever, itchy eyes) on January 22 |
|
aged |
|
|
|
Patient 2 (cousin): 16/F, exposed to Px 1 on Jan 19, developed |
|
outside Wuhan |
|
|
|
symptoms on January 26 |
|
and characteristics |
|
|
|
Patient 3 (previous classmate): 22/M, exposed to Px 1 on Jan 21, |
|
of young patients |
|
|
|
developed symptoms on January 24 |
|
with |
|
|
|
Patient 4 (previous classmate): 22/M, exposed to Px 1 on Jan 21, |
|
prospective contact- |
|
|
|
developed symptoms on January 22 |
|
tracing study |
|
|
|
Patient 5 (previous classmate): 22/M, exposed to Px 1 on Jan 21, |
|
|
|
|
|
developed symptoms on January 25 |
|
Huang L, Zhang X, |
|
|
|
Patient 6 (previous classmate): 21/M, exposed to Px 1 on Jan 21, |
|
Zhang X, Wei Z, Zhang |
|
|
|
developed symptoms on January 23 |
|
L, Xu J, Liang P, Xu Y, |
|
|
|
Patient 7 (previous classmate): 22/M, exposed to Px 1 on Jan 21, |
|
Zhang C, Xu A |
|
|
|
developed symptoms on January 23 |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 8 (previous classmate): 23/M, exposed to Px 1 on Jan 21, |
|
|
|
|
|
developed symptoms on January 22 |
3 |
Asymptomatic |
Case series |
India |
A family of four returned from Saudi Arabia on March 13. Family |
|
|
transmission of severe |
|
|
|
was quarantined on March 19 when 3 members developed |
|
acute respiratory |
|
|
|
symptoms. They all tested positive on March 22. A total of 368 |
|
|
|
|
individuals were identified on contact tracing (43 family members |
|
|
2 within a family |
|
|
|
and 325 |
|
cluster of 26 cases: |
|
|
|
tested positive for |
|
Why quarantine is |
|
|
|
|
|
important? |
|
|
|
|
|
Mahapure KS, |
|
|
|
|
|
Kulkarni NS |
|
|
|
|
4 A cluster of the Corona |
Case series |
China |
Cluster of four |
||
|
Virus Disease 2019 |
(collected |
|
generations |
cases |
|
caused by incubation |
from Public |
|
(n=15) |
cases C and D only contacted with the |
|
period transmission in |
Health |
|
median age of |
once and infected the |
|
Wuxi, China |
Emergency |
|
51 years old |
Cases E and F of the third generation had meals at the same table |
|
|
Reporting |
|
|
with cases |
|
Gao Y, Shi C, Chen |
Management |
|
|
days before the onset of the disease, and |
|
Y, Shi P, Liu J, Xiao Y, |
Information |
|
|
G infected case O after spending 4 hours with him 9 days prior to |
|
et al. |
System) |
|
|
onset. We analyzed 6 cases of a clear history of unique exposure |
|
|
|
|
|
and onset, with a median incubation period of 10 days (range, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
suspected exposures. |
In this cluster, each generational case(s) transmitted to the next generation during their incubation period and the time was
8 |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA |
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
Is
Appendix 3. Characteristic of Included Studies (continued)
No. |
Title/Author |
Study design |
Country |
Population |
Key findings |
5 |
Delivery of infection |
Case series |
Luzhou, |
Familial cluster |
Patient 3/4/5 – (+) travel to Wuhan |
|
from asymptomatic |
|
China |
of five patients |
Contact of all 5 cases – Jan |
|
carriers of |
|
|
|
|
|
in a familial cluster |
|
|
|
Patient 1 – 50/F, mother of Case 2, severe pneumonia, mild |
|
|
|
|
symptoms of cough and fever Feb 1 then became better. Feb |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 had fever recurrence, dizziness, |
|
Ye F, Xu S, Rong Z, Xu |
|
|
|
shortness of breath |
|
R, Liu X, Deng P, Liu |
|
|
|
Patient 2 – 28/M, nephew of Case 3,4 cousin of Case 5, |
|
H, Xu X |
|
|
|
asymptomatic |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 3 – 50/M, uncle of Case 2, had contact with Case 1 and 2, |
|
|
|
|
|
14 days prior to her symptoms fever and cough on Feb 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 4 – 51/F, aunt of Case 2, had contact with Case 1 and 2, |
|
|
|
|
|
12 days prior to her symptoms on Feb 5 diarrhea and throat pain |
|
|
|
|
|
after admission but without radiographic abnormalities |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 5 – 23/M, cousin of Case 2, had contact with Case 1 and |
|
|
|
|
|
2, 14 days prior to her symptoms of fever and cough on Feb 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Before Case 1 presented with symptoms, Case |
|
|
|
|
|
asymptomatic. Case 2 did not present with signs and symptoms |
|
|
|
|
|
of infection despite COVID positive |
|
|
|
|
|
an asymptomatic carrier. |
|
|
|
|
|
asymptomatic carriers during the incubation period. |
6 |
Asymptomatic and |
Case series |
Xuzhou, |
2 family clusters |
Patient 1 (index): 56 yo/M stayed at the Hankou station in Wuhan |
|
|
China |
(n = 7) |
on route to Xuzhou, China (Jan 14). Index case was confirmed |
|
|
Transmission of SARS- |
|
|
|
with COVID 19 on Jan 25 with symptoms of fever, cough and |
|
|
|
|
sore throat. All the six patients who he was in contact with tested |
|
|
Cluster, Xuzhou, China |
|
|
|
positive for COVID 19 between Jan |
|
Li C, Ji F, Wang L, |
|
|
|
Close contact (Jan 14 |
|
Wang L, Hao J, Dai M, |
|
|
|
Patient 2: 32/F pregnant daughter, had contact with index case 6 |
|
et al. |
|
|
|
days before index case presented with symptoms |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 3: 21/F daughter, had contact with index case 6 days |
|
|
|
|
|
before index case presented with symptoms |
Patient 4: 42/M,
Patient 6: 34/M, son of Px 5, had contact with index case Jan 15- 18 while index case was asymptomatic, had contact with index case 5 days before index case presented with symptoms Patient 7: 56/F, wife of Px 5, had contact with Px 5, 2 days before Px 4 presented with fever
The study confirms asymptomatic and
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA |
9 |
Is
Appendix 3. Characteristic of Included Studies (continued)
No. |
Title/Author |
Study design |
Country |
Population |
Key findings |
7 |
A |
Case series |
Zhejiang |
Nine family |
Index patients were a couple who participated in a temple activity |
|
Transmission within |
|
China |
members |
on Jan 19. Patient |
|
a family cluster by |
|
|
|
index patients’ onset of symptoms. Patient |
|
presymptomatic |
|
|
|
Case |
|
infectors in China |
|
|
|
5, all the family members with direct and indirect contact with |
|
|
|
|
|
the index cases became COVID positive. Index 2 and Case 4 |
|
Qian G, Yang N, Ma |
|
|
|
remained asymptomatic. |
|
AHY, Wang L, Li G, |
|
|
|
|
|
Chen X, Chen X. |
|
|
|
Patient 1 (index 1): 58/F, had fever, fatigue and headache on |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 24, diagnosed |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 2 (index 2): 60/M, remained asymptomatic, diagnosed |
|
|
|
|
|
on Feb 1 with |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 3: 32/F, daughter of index patients, had contact with |
|
|
|
|
|
Index 1 and 2 between Jan |
|
|
|
|
|
symptoms), had fever and cough on Jan 27 |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 4: 32/M, son in law, had contact with Index 1 and 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
between Jan |
|
|
|
|
|
fever on Feb 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 5: 6/F, grandchild, asymptomatic, COVID negative, had |
|
|
|
|
|
contact with Index 1 and 2 between Jan |
|
|
|
|
|
Index 1 had symptoms) |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 6: 13m/F, grandchild, asymptomatic, COVID positive, |
|
|
|
|
|
had contact with Index 1 and 2 between Jan |
|
|
|
|
|
Index 1 had symptoms) |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 7: 57/F, mother of Patient 4, had dinner with Patient |
|
|
|
|
|
on Jan 23 (4 days before Patient 3 had symptoms) |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 8: 57/M, father of Patient 4, had dinner with Patient |
|
|
|
|
|
on Jan 23 (4 days before Patient 3 had symptoms) |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 9: 76/F, grandmother of Patient 4, had dinner with |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient |
8 |
Indirect Virus |
Case series |
China |
Cluster of |
7 people with close contact working in the same office tested |
|
Transmission in Cluster |
|
|
positive with the virus. |
|
|
of |
|
|
in a shopping |
Possible index case has history of travel to Wuhan - returned in |
|
Wenzhou, China |
|
|
mall (n=35) |
December 18, exhibited mild symptoms in January 15. |
|
|
|
|
|
Symptoms of other 6 officemates started between January 1 |
|
Cai J, Sun W, Huang |
|
|
|
to 14. |
|
J, Gamber M, Wu J, |
|
|
|
Additional 28 people were diagnosed with |
|
He G. |
|
|
|
10 mall customers, 11 close contacts). |
|
|
|
|
|
Only 16 patients had direct contact with case patients but other |
|
|
|
|
|
positive cases shared facilities (restrooms, elevators). |
9 |
Potential |
Case series |
China |
Family cluster |
2 cases of |
|
Presymptomatic |
|
|
of |
had dinner with a teacher from Wuhan who was later found out |
|
Transmission of SARS- |
|
|
cases |
to have |
|
|
|
|
during the conference and dinner. No other known potential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
exposures to COVID were noted. |
|
Tong ZD, Tang A, Li KF, |
|
|
|
The family members of the 2 cases were later positive with |
|
Li P, Wang HL, Yi JP, |
|
|
|
|
|
Zhang YL, Yan JB |
|
|
|
|
10 |
A familial cluster of |
Case series |
China |
Family cluster of |
4 |
|
infection associated |
|
|
The first case who developed symptoms had limited mobility and |
|
|
with the 2019 novel |
|
|
(n=4) |
did not leave the house in 2 weeks prior to illness. He only had |
|
coronavirus indicating |
|
|
|
contact with the other 3 cases (2 of which arrived 5 days earlier |
|
potential |
|
|
|
from Wuhan) who developed symptoms after him. |
|
person transmission |
|
|
|
|
|
during the incubation |
|
|
|
|
|
period |
|
|
|
|
Yu P, Zhu J, Zhang Z,
Han Y, Huang L.
10 |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA |
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
Is
Appendix 3. Characteristic of Included Studies (continued)
No. |
Title/Author |
Study design |
Country |
Population |
11 |
A locally transmitted |
Case report |
Taiwan |
|
|
case of |
|
|
woman from |
|
infection in Taiwan |
|
|
Taiwan with |
|
|
|
|
travel history to |
|
Liu YC, Liao CH, Chang |
|
|
Wuhan, China |
|
CF, Chou CC, Lin YR |
|
|
and her |
|
|
|
|
old husband |
Key findings
The index case presented with fever and myalgia 5 days after her arrival from China. At the same time, her husband presented with rhinorrhea and both sought medical consult. Both tested positive for
Patient 1 (Index case): 52/F, travelled from Wuhan, China, had fever and myalgia on Jan 25
Patient 2: 50/M, husband of index case, had contact with index case on Jan 21, 4 days before index case had symptoms, presented with rhinorrhea on Jan 25
12 |
Transmission of 2019- |
Case series |
Germany |
2 cases (Patient 1&2) met with a Shanghai business partner |
|
|
nCoV Infection from an |
|
|
(n=4) |
who did not exhibit symptoms during her stay in Germany. |
|
Asymptomatic Contact |
|
|
|
However, she became ill on her flight back to China. The other 2 |
|
in Germany |
|
|
|
cases (Patient 3&4) had contact with Patient 1 while he was still |
|
Rothe C, Schunk M, |
|
|
|
asymptomatic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sothmann P, Bretzel G, |
|
|
|
|
|
Froeschl G, Wallrauch |
|
|
|
|
|
C, Zimmer T, Thiel V, |
|
|
|
|
|
Janke C, Guggemos |
|
|
|
|
|
W, Seilmaier M, |
|
|
|
|
|
Drosten C, Vollmar P, |
|
|
|
|
|
Zwirglmaier K, Zange S, |
|
|
|
|
|
Wölfel R, Hoelscher M. |
|
|
|
|
13 |
Characteristics of a |
Case series |
China |
Family cluster |
The index patient |
|
family cluster of Severe |
|
|
of |
from January |
|
Acute Respiratory |
|
|
cases |
family members while she was in the |
|
Syndrome Coronavirus |
|
|
|
|
|
2 in Henan, China |
|
|
|
Patient 1 – index case, 38/F, symptoms and positive on Feb 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 2 – 87/F, grandmother of Px 1, lived with Px 1, symptoms |
|
Jiang Y, Niu W, Wang |
|
|
|
on Feb 2, positive test on Feb 8 |
|
Q, Zhao H, Meng L, |
|
|
|
Patient 3 – 66/M, father of Px 1, lived with Px 1, symptoms on |
|
Zhang C |
|
|
|
Feb 3, radiologic change but negative test |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 4 – 68/F, mother of Px 1, lived with Px 1, symptoms on |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 4, radiologic change but negative test |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 5 – 58/M, uncle of Px 1, exposure Jan 24 & 27, positive |
|
|
|
|
|
test on Feb 8, asymptomatic |
Patient 6 – 59/F, aunt of Px 1, exposure Jan 24 & 27, positive test on Feb 8, asymptomatic
Patient 7 – 55/M, uncle of Px 1, exposure Jan 24 & 27, symptoms and radiologic change Feb 8, negative test
Patient 8 – 34/F cousin of Px 1, exposure Jan 24, symptoms on Feb 2, radiologic change but negative test
Patient 9 – 34/M, husband of Px 8, exposure Jan 27, symptoms on Feb 8, positive test on Feb 11
Patient 10 – 56/M, Father of Px 9, exposure Jan 27, symptoms on Feb 2, positive test on Feb 5
Patient 11
Patient 12 – 34/F, exposure Jan 27, sister of Px 9, symptoms Feb 6, positive test on Feb 8
Patient 13 – 9/M, son of Px 12, symptoms and positive test Feb 10
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA 11 |
Is
Appendix 3. Characteristic of Included Studies (continued)
No. |
Title/Author |
Study design |
Country |
Population |
Key findings |
14 |
Transmission of |
Case series |
China |
Family cluster of |
Patient A |
|
|
|
of |
||
|
terminal stage of |
|
|
(n=6) |
with him from January |
|
incubation period: |
|
|
|
developed symptoms on Feb 7. Close contacts of Patient A were |
|
a familial cluster, |
|
|
|
5 family members he visited and lived with in Zhoushan on Jan |
|
International Journal of |
|
|
|
31 - Feb 3. Of the 5 family members, 4 (80%) tested positive for |
|
Infectious Diseases |
|
|
|
|
|
Li P, Fu JB, Li KF, |
|
|
|
Patient A – 56/M, index patient, positive on Feb 6, symptoms on |
|
Chen Y, et al. |
|
|
|
Feb 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient B – 66/M, |
|
|
|
|
|
test on Feb 9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient C – 64/F, |
|
|
|
|
|
test on Feb 9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient D – 42/F, |
|
|
|
|
|
test on Feb 9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient E – 7/F, daughter of Px A, positive test on Feb 9, |
|
|
|
|
|
asymptomatic |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient F – 41/F, wife of Px A, negative test and asymptomatic |
15 |
A |
Case series |
China |
A cluster of |
A |
|
cluster infection |
|
|
to Xianyang on January 22. Routine examination was done on |
|
|
reveals asymptomatic |
|
|
|
January 30 when here daughter presented with COVID symptoms |
|
transmission to |
|
|
|
and tested positive. The index case had negative |
|
children |
|
|
|
showed |
|
|
|
|
|
quarantined. She developed symptoms on February 6 and tested |
|
Chen M, Fan P, Liu Z, |
|
|
|
positive on Feb 9. She was exposed to her two children who |
|
et al. |
|
|
|
developed the disease from Jan 22 to Jan 30. |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 1 – index case, 34/F, CT scan findings on Jan 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
symptoms on Feb 6, positive test on Feb 9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 2 – 8/F, daughter of Px 1, symptoms and positive test on |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 3 – 9/M, son of Px 1, symptoms and positive test on |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 4 – husband of Px 1, negative test on Jan 31 |
16 |
Familial cluster of |
Case series |
China |
Familial cluster |
Patient 1 (index case) was a |
|
|
|
of five patients |
Wuhan, China came back to Beijing on Jan 19. He did not have |
|
|
from an asymptomatic |
|
|
(index patient |
signs and symptoms of the disease before his family members |
|
|
|
|
and 4 close |
each became sick. He went to hospital for assessment on Jan 23. |
|
Zhang J, Tian S, Lou J, |
|
|
contacts) |
All 5 patients (index + 4 contacts) tested positive for COVID 19. |
|
Chen Y. |
|
|
|
Index case and Px 2 remained asymptomatic. |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 2: 45/F, wife of index case, had fever on Jan 23, had |
|
|
|
|
|
contact with index case since Jan 19 |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 3: asymptomatic, had contact with index case since Jan 19 |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 4: 38/M, nephew of index case, started to have fever and |
|
|
|
|
|
fatigue on Jan 22 after meeting his uncle on Jan 19 |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 5: mother of Px 3, had fever and joint pain on Jan 27, had |
|
|
|
|
|
contact with Px 3 since Jan 19 |
|
|
|
|
|
Asymptomatic cases should be identified and isolated |
|
|
|
|
|
appropriately to prevent disease spread to close contacts. |
17 |
The different clinical |
Case series |
Jinan, China |
Nine children |
There were 2 adult |
|
characteristics of |
|
|
and their |
epidemiologic source of possible contact with anyone diagnosed |
|
corona virus disease |
|
|
families with |
with |
|
cases between |
|
|
from Wuhan, or any person with respiratory symptoms. The study |
|
|
children and their |
|
|
infection |
suggest that asymptomatic carriers may infect other people. |
|
families in China - the |
|
|
|
|
|
character of children |
|
|
|
|
|
with |
|
|
|
|
|
Su L, Ma X, Yu H, |
|
|
|
|
|
Zhang Z, Bian P, Han |
|
|
|
|
|
Y, et al. |
|
|
|
|
12 |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA |
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
Is
Appendix 3. Characteristic of Included Studies (continued)
No. |
Title/Author |
Study design |
Country |
Population |
Key findings |
18 |
Clinical characteristics |
Case series |
China |
Asymptomatic |
24 cases: 5 developed symptoms, 7 showed no symptoms and |
|
of 24 asymptomatic |
|
|
normal CT scan findings |
|
|
infections with |
|
|
(no symptoms |
CT scan findings: 12 had ground glass opacities, 5 strip shadowing |
|
|
|
on testing) |
3 family members of Case 13 (no symptoms and normal CT |
|
|
among close contacts |
|
|
screened from |
scan findings) were diagnosed with |
|
in Nanjing, China. |
|
|
close contacts |
symptoms. All 3 denied history of travel or contact with confirmed |
|
Hu Z, Song C, Xu C, Jin |
|
|
(n=24) |
or suspected |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G, Chen Y, Xu X, Ma H, |
|
|
|
Relative 1 (Wife of Case 13): Fever, cough, fatigue, vomiting (8 |
|
Chen W, Lin Y, Zheng |
|
|
|
days after return of Case 13 from Hubei) |
|
Y, Wang J, Hu Z, Yi Y, |
|
|
|
Relative 2 (Son of Case 13): Fever, cough (5 days after return of |
|
Shen H. |
|
|
|
Case 13 from Hubei) |
|
|
|
|
|
Relative 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
arthralgia (4 days after return of case 13 from Hubei) |
19 |
Presumed |
Case series |
China |
Family cluster of |
5 |
|
Asymptomatic Carrier |
|
|
(+) case who had history of travel from Wuhan. All 5 patients |
|
|
Transmission of |
|
|
(n=6) |
were symptomatic with characteristic CT scan findings. Patient |
|
|
|
|
2 met the primary case on January 10 and 13 while Patient |
|
|
|
|
|
|
met Patient 1 on January 13. None of the patients had travel to |
|
Bai Y, Yao L, Wei T, |
|
|
|
Wuhan or contact with anyone else from Wuhan. However, initial |
|
Tian F, Jin DY, Chen L, |
|
|
|
COVID test of the asymptomatic case was negative and was only |
|
Wang M. |
|
|
|
positive on repeat testing which was about 19 days after contact |
|
|
|
|
|
with the patients. |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 1: primary case traveled from Wuhan on January 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 2: developed symptoms January 23 |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 3: developed symptoms January 25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 4: developed symptoms January 26 |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 5: developed symptoms January 25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 6: developed symptoms January 17 |
|
|
|
|
|
Incubation period: |
20 |
Transmission and |
Case series |
China |
Of 104 |
|
|
clinical characteristics |
|
|
cases admitted |
(0.96%) with no documented transmission. 4 asymptomatic cases |
|
of coronavirus disease |
|
|
at hospitals in |
were identified on contact tracing with 2 cases transmitting |
|
2019 in 104 outside- |
|
|
Hunan province |
the infection to 3 relatives each. However, one of the 4 cases |
|
Wuhan patients, China |
|
|
from Jan |
were not tested for |
|
|
|
|
23 and their |
asymptomatic carrier because he was identified as the index case |
|
Qiu C, Deng Z, Xiao |
|
|
contacts |
of three of his relatives who tested positive. |
|
Q, et al. |
|
|
|
|
21 |
Asymptomatic |
Case series |
Brunei |
Asymptomatic |
A religious event in Malaysia on February 28 to March 2 attended |
|
transmission of SARS- |
|
|
by 16,000 people became an international |
|
|
|
|
cases and their |
event (SSE). Nineteen of the 75 people (25.3%) who attended |
|
|
for mass gatherings |
|
|
contacts |
tested positive for |
|
|
|
|
|
clusters connected to this |
|
Wong J, et al. |
|
|
|
asymptomatic transmission. |
Cluster A (household cluster)
Patient 1 – 30/M, index patient, traveled to Malaysia on Feb 27 for SSE and returned March 3, positive March 10
Patient 2 – 32/F, wife of Px 1, symptoms Mar 9, positive Mar 12 Patient 3 – 10mo/F, daughter of Px 1, symptoms Mar 11, positive Mar 12
Patient
Cluster B (school cluster)
Patient 1 – 13/F, father attended SSE and tested positive on Mar 11, positive on Mar 11
Patient 2 – 39/F, teacher of Px 1, exposed to Px 1 from Mar 3 to 12, positive on Mar 13, symptoms on Mar 16
Patient
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA 13 |
Is
Appendix 3. Characteristic of Included Studies (continued)
No. |
Title/Author |
Study design |
Country |
Population |
Key findings |
22 |
The epidemiological |
Case series |
China |
Surveillance data from January 20 to March 6 in Ningbo City |
|
|
characteristics of |
|
|
cases in Ningbo, |
identified 191 |
|
infection in close |
|
|
China and their |
30 asymptomatic). The symptomatic cases had 2001 close |
|
contacts of |
|
|
close contacts |
contacts with 126 testing positive for |
|
in Ningbo city |
|
|
|
asymptomatic cases had 146 close contacts with 6 testing |
|
|
|
|
|
positive. The infection rate of close contacts (number of cases |
|
Chen Y, Wang A, Yi B, |
|
|
|
per contact) was calculated at 6.30% for symptomatic cases and |
|
et. al. |
|
|
|
4.11% for asymptomatic cases. The difference was not statistically |
|
|
|
|
|
significant (χ 2 = 1.128, P > 0.05). |
|
|
|
|
|
Timing of contact with symptomatic cases to determine if |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
The relative |
Statistical |
Hong Kong |
Based on data from study of Chen et. al., the reproduction number |
|
|
transmissibility |
modelling |
|
cases and their |
(ratio of the case counts in the first generation divided by those in |
|
of asymptomatic |
analysis |
|
contacts |
the second generation) was calculated as 0.76 (126/161) and 0.20 |
|
|
|
|
(6/30) for the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups respectively |
|
|
among close contacts. |
|
|
|
with RR of 3.9 (95%CI: |
|
He D, Zhao S, Lin Q, |
|
|
|
From the classic ‘SEIR’ modelling framework, the RR of the risk |
|
Zhuang Z, et. al. |
|
|
|
(probability) of transmission per contact of the symptomatic group |
|
|
|
|
|
against the asymptomatic group was estimated at 1.5 (95%CI: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
but the difference is not statistically significant. |
|
|
|
|
|
Results may be due to difference in the contact tracing |
|
|
|
|
|
surveillance scheme implemented on the two groups of the |
|
|
|
|
|
primary cases. In such case, the RR estimate may be higher than |
|
|
|
|
|
its true value. |
24 |
Comparison of |
Statistical |
China |
After excluding cases associated with |
|
|
transmissibility of |
modelling |
|
cases and their |
data of Chen et. al., the odds ratio and difference in transmission |
|
coronavirus between |
analysis |
|
contacts |
rates were not statistically significant by Fisher’s exact test |
|
symptomatic and |
|
|
|
between symptomatic and asymptomatic cases. The odds ratio |
|
asymptomatic |
|
|
|
of transmission rates of coronavirus between the symptomatic |
|
patients: Reanalysis of |
|
|
|
and asymptomatic patients is 1.2 with a 95% confidence interval |
|
the Ningbo |
|
|
|
[0.5, 2.8]. |
|
data |
|
|
|
|
|
Yin G, Jin H |
|
|
|
|
25 |
Characterization of |
Retrospective |
China |
Asymptomatic |
Of the 279 |
|
an asymptomatic |
cohort |
|
identified between January to March 2020, 63 (23%) were |
|
|
cohort of |
|
|
|
asymptomatic. Among the asymptomatic cases, there were 18 |
|
infected individuals |
|
|
|
cases of familial clustering in which 9 cases transmitted the virus |
|
outside of Wuhan, |
|
|
|
to others. |
|
China |
|
|
|
|
|
Wang Y, Tong J, Qin Y, |
|
|
|
|
|
et. al. |
|
|
|
|
26 |
Coronavirus Disease |
Case series |
South Korea |
Residents, |
In a building in Seoul, 97 of 1,143 tested positive for |
|
Outbreak in Call |
|
|
employees |
Among the 97 patients, 89 (91.7%) were symptomatic, 4 (4.1%) |
|
Center, South Korea |
|
|
and visitors in |
were |
|
|
|
|
a building in |
A total of 225 household contacts were identified from the |
|
Park SY, Kim YM, Yi S, |
|
|
Seoul, South |
positive cases. |
|
Lee, S, et. al. |
|
|
Korea and their |
symptomatic cases. None of the 11 household contacts of pre- |
|
|
|
|
household |
symptomatic cases and 4 household contacts of asymptomatic |
|
|
|
|
contacts |
cases tested positive for |
The actual transmissibility of
14 |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA |
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
Is
Appendix 3. Characteristic of Included Studies (continued)
No. |
Title/Author |
Study design |
Country |
Population |
Key findings |
27 |
A study on infectivity |
Case Report |
China |
Asymptomatic |
An asymptomatic |
|
of asymptomatic |
|
|
congenital heart disease had a total of 455 contacts (224 hospital |
|
|
|
|
and her contacts |
staff, 196 family members, 35 patients) who were either exposed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
to the index patient or was around the emergency department |
|
Gao M, Yang L, Chen |
|
|
|
observation unit (EDOU). |
|
X, Deng Y, Yang S, Xu |
|
|
|
|
|
H, Chen Z, Gao X |
|
|
|
Of the 35 patients, none tested positive for |
|
|
|
|
|
multiple tests. Median contact time was four days and longest |
|
|
|
|
|
was 21 days. All patients wore masks and were admitted at the |
|
|
|
|
|
infectious ward for medical isolation. Patient bed in the EDOU are |
|
|
|
|
|
placed 1.2 meters apart. |
|
|
|
|
|
None of the 196 family members who visited the ED tested |
|
|
|
|
|
positive for |
|
|
|
|
|
Family members also wore masks while visiting the ED. |
|
|
|
|
|
Of the 224 hospital staff identified, 59 (26.3%) were doctors and |
|
|
|
|
|
101 (45.1%) were nurses. Others were security guards, cleaners, |
|
|
|
|
|
transportation personnel, etc. All personnel in the ED were |
|
|
|
|
|
required to wear PPE such as N95 masks, isolation gowns and |
|
|
|
|
|
googles. None of the hospital staff tested positive or developed |
|
|
|
|
|
symptoms. |
28 |
Healthcare Personnel |
Case report |
USA |
Asymptomatic |
A |
|
Exposure to a Patient |
|
|
orthopedic surgery in March 2020 after being in a vehicular |
|
|
with Asymptomatic |
|
|
|
accident. Duration of general anesthesia was 6 hours and 5 |
|
|
|
|
minutes. When the procedure was almost completed, the lead |
|
|
during a Prolonged |
|
|
|
surgeon was informed of ground glass opacities on the patient’s |
|
Surgical Intervention |
|
|
|
chest |
|
|
|
|
|
OR staff changed their attire to |
|
Lucar J, Navalkele, B., |
|
|
|
patient was placed on contact and droplet precautions. The |
|
et al. |
|
|
|
patient was tested for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
healthcare workers, staff exposed during the surgery, only one |
was tested for COVID due to symptoms of dry cough and result was negative. The rest of the team did not develop any symptoms. No nosocomial transmission of
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA 15 |
This HTML is created from PDF at
Is
Appendix 3. Characteristic of Included Studies (continued)
No. |
Title/Author |
Study design |
Country |
Population |
Key findings |
29 |
Transmission potential |
Case series |
China |
3 family clusters |
Patient 1 and 2 had travel to Xiaogan, a city adjacent to Wuhan, |
|
of asymptomatic and |
|
|
|
from Dec 29, 2019 to Jan 15, 2020. They had changed trains in |
|
paucisymptomatic |
|
|
|
Wuhan. No other patients had known travel history. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
infections: a three- |
|
|
|
Patient 1 – 62/F, Jan 12 had cough and rhinorrhea, confirmed |
|
family cluster study in |
|
|
|
|
|
China. |
|
|
|
Patient 2 – 65/M, husband of patient 1, Jan 17 had symptoms, |
|
|
|
|
|
confirmed |
|
Jiang X, Zhang XL, |
|
|
|
Patient 3 – 37/M, son, household contact initially asymptomatic, |
|
Zhao XN, Li CB, et. al. |
|
|
|
confirmed |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 23 |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 4 – 35/F, |
|
|
|
|
|
negative but confirmed |
|
|
|
|
|
asymptomatic |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 5 – 53/F, mother of patient 4, close contact of patient 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
& 4 and stayed for 1 night at the house of Patient |
|
|
|
|
|
She was asymptomatic, confirmed |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 6 – 28/M, son of Patient 5, had fever and was hospitalized |
|
|
|
|
|
on Jan 25, confirmed |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 7 – 35/M, close contact of patient 3 at the factory and |
|
|
|
|
|
dined with Patient 3 on Jan 18, confirmed |
|
|
|
|
|
only had occasional cough |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 8 – 3m/F, daughter of patient 7, asymptomatic, confirmed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A total of 88 contacts of Patient 3 were identified before he |
|
|
|
|
|
became symptomatic, and two contacts (Patients 5 and 7) tested |
|
|
|
|
|
positive for |
|
|
|
|
|
5 were identified, and one contact (Patient 6) tested positive for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
during the |
|
|
|
|
|
for asymptomatic Patient 5. |
30 |
Suppression of |
Cross- |
Italy |
Residents |
At the first survey, 73 of 2812 subjects tested positive (2.6%). |
|
sectional |
|
of Vo, Italy |
The second survey reported 29 of 2,343 subjects were positive |
|
|
in the municipality of |
|
|
(n=2812, 2343) |
(1.2%). Asymptomatic infection was 41.1% and 44.8% in the first |
|
Vo’, Italy |
|
|
|
and second survey respectively. 8 new cases were identified in the |
|
|
|
|
|
second survey, 4 of which were exposed to asymptomatic cases. |
|
Lavezzo E, Franchin E, |
|
|
|
|
|
Ciavarella C, et al. |
|
|
|
cluster with 7 secondary cases (3 living in the same household, 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
attended a gathering four days prior to symptom onset). |
31 |
Case series |
China |
One of the 17 cases monitored was asymptomatic. However, viral |
||
|
Load in Upper |
|
|
(n=17) |
load detected from |
|
Respiratory Specimens |
|
|
|
were similar with symptomatic cases. |
|
of Infected Patients |
|
|
|
|
|
Zou L, Ruan F, Huan |
|
|
|
|
|
M, et. al. |
|
|
|
|
32 |
A Well Infant with |
Case report |
Singapore |
6 month old |
Aside from 1 episode of fever, infant was asymptomatic but |
|
Coronavirus Disease |
|
|
COVID (+) infant |
nasopharyngeal swabs were positive for |
|
2019 |
|
|
|
after admission. Stool was also positive for |
|
High Viral Load |
|
|
|
had no gastrointestinal symptoms. |
|
Kam KQ, Yung CF, Cui |
|
|
|
No asymptomatic transmission was recorded. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L, Lin Tzer Pin R, Mak |
|
|
|
|
|
TM, Maiwald M, Li J, |
|
|
|
|
Chong CY, Nadua K,
Tan NWH, Thoon KC.
16 |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA |
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
Is
Appendix 3. Characteristic of Included Studies (continued)
No. |
Title/Author |
Study design |
Country |
Population |
Key findings |
33 |
Severe Acute |
Case series |
Vietnam |
2 clusters of |
In the 1st cluster, eight employees were sent to Wuhan, China |
|
Respiratory Syndrome |
|
|
patients |
for training for 2 months. 6/8 travelers developed signs and |
|
Coronavirus 2 |
|
|
|
symptoms within 10 days of their return to Vietnam and were |
|
Shedding by Travelers, |
|
|
1st cluster: |
diagnosed with COVID 19. The remaining 2 were quarantined |
|
Vietnam, 2020 |
|
|
travelers |
and turned out negative. |
|
|
|
|
2nd cluster: |
In the 2nd cluster, 11/12 patients had signs and symptoms and |
|
Le TQM, Takemura T, |
|
|
patients with |
|
|
Moi ML, Nabeshima T, |
|
|
close contact |
tested positive for |
|
Nguyen LKH, Hoang |
|
|
with the |
cough, were demonstrated by 11 patients an average of 9.9 (± |
|
VMP, et al. |
|
|
travelers (age |
5.4) days after travel or close contact with |
|
|
|
|
range 3 months |
indicating an incubation period of |
|
|
|
|
– 55 years old) |
Virus shedding was detected from day 1 after illness onset |
|
|
|
|
|
through day 19 (4.6 days) after potential initial exposure. There |
|
|
|
|
|
was one asymptomatic patient (55 yo/M) who demonstrated |
|
|
|
|
|
virus shedding up to 9 days. This indicates potential virus |
|
|
|
|
|
transmission in the absence of clinical signs and symptoms. |
34 |
The enlightenment |
Case series |
China |
2 asymptomatic infections were identified from 78 laboratory |
|
|
from two cases |
|
|
|
confirmed cases. These cases were identified from contact tracing. |
|
of asymptomatic |
|
|
|
Both never developed any symptoms. They were discharged after |
|
infection with SARS- |
|
|
|
9 days and 25 days respectively after 2 consecutive negative RT- |
|
|
|
|
PCR tests. |
|
|
14 days of isolation? |
|
|
|
Patient 1: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mao ZQ, Wan R, He |
|
|
|
scan on a |
|
LY, Hu YC, Chen W |
|
|
|
on |
|
|
|
|
|
on February 7 and discharged after 2 negative |
|
|
|
|
|
results on February 14 and 16. |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 2: The |
|
|
|
|
|
had |
|
|
|
|
|
Wuhan 10 days ago tested positive for |
|
|
|
|
|
isolated on January 27 and discharged on February 21 after two |
|
|
|
|
|
negative test results. |
35 |
Asymptomatic and |
Prospective |
King County, |
Residents of a |
There were 23 (30.3%) residents who tested positive by |
|
Presymptomatic SARS- |
single cohort |
Washington, |
of which 13 (56.5%) were asymptomatic. The asymptomatic |
|
|
|
USA |
skilled nursing |
patients were reassessed after one week, of which 10 developed |
|
|
Residents of a Long- |
|
|
facility (SNF) in |
symptoms and were categorized as |
|
Term Care Skilled |
|
|
King County, |
initial testing. Three remained asymptomatic. |
|
Nursing Facility — King |
|
|
Washington |
|
|
County, Washington, |
|
|
(n = 76) |
The mean interval from testing to symptom onset in the pre- |
|
March 2020. |
|
|
|
symptomatic residents was 3 days. |
|
Kimball A, Hatfield |
|
|
|
|
|
KM, Arons M, James A, |
|
|
|
residents with positive test results for |
|
Taylor J, Spicer K, et al. |
|
|
|
from 18.6 to 29.2 (symptomatic [typical symptoms]), 24.3 to |
|
|
|
|
|
26.3 (symptomatic [atypical symptoms only]), 15.3 to 37.9 (pre- |
|
|
|
|
|
symptomatic), and 21.9 to 31.0 (asymptomatic). There were no |
|
|
|
|
|
significant differences between the mean Ct values in the four |
|
|
|
|
|
symptom status groups (p = 0.3). |
Transmission from asymptomatic and
Study was limited by the possible inaccuracy of symptom ascertainment among residents with cognitive impairment and other disabilities. The population involves the older age group with underlying medical conditions. Results may not hold true for general population.
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA 17 |
Is
Appendix 3. Characteristic of Included Studies (continued)
No. |
Title/Author |
Study design |
Country |
Population |
Key findings |
36 |
Presymptomatic |
Prospective |
King County, |
Residents of a |
In a nursing facility in Washington, USA, 48 of the 89 residents |
|
single cohort |
Washington, |
tested positive for |
||
|
and Transmission in a |
|
USA |
skilled nursing |
symptoms, 4 (8%) had atypical symptoms, and 27 (56%) had no |
|
Skilled Nursing Facility |
|
|
facility (SNF) in |
new symptoms. |
|
|
|
|
King County, |
|
|
Arons M, Hatfield KM, |
|
|
Washington (n |
Eighty nine percent (24/27) who were initially asymptomatic |
|
Reddy SC, Kimball A, |
|
|
= 89) |
developed symptoms within the next 7 days (median 4 days, |
|
et. al. |
|
|
|
IQR |
|
|
|
|
|
median |
|
|
|
|
|
status groups were similar (asymptomatic residents, 25.5; pre- |
|
|
|
|
|
symptomatic residents, 23.1; residents with atypical symptoms, |
|
|
|
|
|
24.2; and residents with typical symptoms, 24.8). Viral growth |
|
|
|
|
|
was observed for specimens obtained from 62.5% of residents |
|
|
|
|
|
with typical symptoms (10/16), 75% with atypical symptoms |
|
|
|
|
|
(3/4), 71% of |
|
|
|
|
|
asymptomatic residents (1/3). |
|
|
|
|
|
Ct values consistent with a high viral load were identified among |
|
|
|
|
|
residents who tested positive before typical symptom onset |
|
|
|
|
|
(median Ct value among 26 observations, 24.0, IQR 20.4 to |
|
|
|
|
|
28.5) and those who tested positive 7 or more days after typical |
|
|
|
|
|
symptom onset (median Ct value among 8 observations, 25.0; |
|
|
|
|
|
IQR, 21.3 to 28.2). Viable virus was isolated from specimens |
|
|
|
|
|
collected 6 days before to 9 days after symptom onset. |
|
|
|
|
|
The transmission of infection from asymptomatic and pre- |
|
|
|
|
|
symptomatic residents was not quantified but evidence suggests |
|
|
|
|
|
potential for substantial viral shedding. |
37 |
Viral dynamics in |
Prospective |
China |
Virologically |
22/31 (71%) developed symptoms after admission, 9 (29%) |
|
asymptomatic patients |
cohort |
|
confirmed to |
remained asymptomatic during hospitalization |
|
with |
|
|
have |
|
|
|
|
|
but were |
Cycle threshold (Ct) values of asymptomatic patients (39.0, IQR |
|
Zhou R, Li F, Chen F, |
|
|
asymptomatic |
|
|
Liu H, Zheng J, Lei C, |
|
|
on admission |
patients (34.5, IQR |
|
Wu X. |
|
|
(n=31) |
in asymptomatic patients. |
|
|
|
|
|
Viral load of asymptomatic patients peaked within the 1st week of |
|
|
|
|
|
admission while for presymptomatic patients peaked during the |
|
|
|
|
|
2nd week of hospitalization. |
|
|
|
|
|
Duration of viral shedding remained similar between the two |
|
|
|
|
|
groups (7 days IQR |
38 |
Viral kinetics of |
Prospective |
South Korea |
Laboratory- |
From 71 hospitalized patients, three presymptomatic patients |
|
cohort |
|
confirmed |
developed symptoms within 14 days of quarantine while 10 |
|
|
asymptomatic carriers |
|
|
remained asymptomatic patients |
|
|
and presymptomatic |
|
|
cases admitted |
|
|
patients |
|
|
at a university |
In two of the three incubation period patients, the viral titer in |
|
|
|
|
hospital (n=71) |
the presymptomatic period was very high (Ct value <20), which |
|
Kim SE, Jeong HS, Yu |
|
|
|
may indicate that patients who have |
|
Y, Shin SU, Kim S, Oh |
|
|
|
infectious when there were no symptoms yet. |
|
TH, Kim UJ, et. al. |
|
|
|
The median days to first negative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
asymptomatic carriers was 4.5 (range |
|
|
|
|
|
asymptomatic carriers reached a first Ct>35 |
|
|
|
|
|
14 days after diagnosis. Although the presence of viral RNA in |
specimens does not distinguish between infective and non- infective viruses, live virus could not be detected by culture in Ct >35.
18 |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA |
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
Is
Appendix 3. Characteristic of Included Studies (continued)
No. |
Title/Author |
Study design |
Country |
Population |
Key findings |
39 The natural history and |
Prospective |
Vietnam |
Of the 30 patients, 17 had mild respiratory disease and 13 were |
||
|
transmission potential |
cohort |
|
patients |
asymptomatic. No progression of symptoms was noted in both |
|
of asymptomatic |
|
|
admitted to Cu |
groups. Demographic and laboratory characteristics of both |
|
|
|
Chi Hospital |
groups were similar on enrollment. |
|
|
|
|
|
(n=30) |
Viral detection in NPS samples on enrollment were more likely |
|
Nguyen VVC, Vo TL, |
|
|
|
in the symptomatic group (62% in asymptomatic vs 100% in |
|
et al. |
|
|
|
symptomatic, p=0.02) but similar for both groups in saliva samples |
|
|
|
|
|
(64% in asymptomatic group vs 81% in symptomatic group, |
|
|
|
|
|
p=0.56). Among those who tested positive on enrollment, viral |
|
|
|
|
|
loads in both NPS and saliva samples were similar in symptomatic |
|
|
|
|
|
and asymptomatic patients (p=0.223). During |
|
|
|
|
|
asymptomatic patients were found to have lower viral loads than |
|
|
|
|
|
symptomatic patients (p=0.027 for difference over first 19 days) |
|
|
|
|
|
and were less likely to test positive for the |
|
|
|
|
|
for difference over first 19 days) with the difference most |
|
|
|
|
|
pronounced during the first week of |
|
|
|
|
|
cases transmitted the infection to up to four people. |
40 |
Asymptomatic |
observational |
South Korea |
Patients with |
Among the 199 patients, 53 (26.6%) were asymptomatic |
|
infection and atypical |
cohort |
|
|
|
|
manifestations |
|
|
residential |
Among the study population, mean duration of viral shedding was |
|
of |
|
|
treatment |
24.5 days. |
|
Comparison of viral |
|
|
center (n=199) |
|
|
shedding duration. |
|
|
|
Duration of viral shedding was longer in symptomatic patients than |
|
Noh JY, Yoon JG, |
|
|
|
in asymptomatic patients (25.2 days versus 22.6 days, p < 0.01) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seong H, Choi WS, |
|
|
|
Among symptomatic patients, patients with chest pain had |
|
Sohn JW, Cheong HJ, |
|
|
|
significantly longer viral shedding |
|
et al. |
|
|
|
(30.0 days versus 25.0 days, p = 0.01). Prolonged viral shedding |
|
|
|
|
|
was also found in patients who complained of sputum (26.8 days |
|
|
|
|
|
versus 24.6 days, p = 0.03). |
41 |
Asymptomatic SARS- |
Case series |
China |
Familial cluster |
Patient 1 – 8/F, travelled from Wuhan to Bishan district with |
|
|
|
|
her mother and 5 others, nasopharyngeal swab negative |
|
|
with viral detection |
|
|
|
for |
|
positive in stool |
|
|
|
nasopharyngeal swab was negative Feb 19 , anal swab became |
|
but negative in |
|
|
|
negative on March 31 |
|
nasopharyngeal |
|
|
|
|
|
samples lasts for |
|
|
|
Patient 2 – 31/M, father of patient 1, symptoms on Jan 20, |
|
42 days |
|
|
|
confirmed Jan 25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 3 – mother of patient 1, COVID negative |
|
Jiang X, Luo M, Zuo Z, |
|
|
|
Patient 4 – 39/F, |
|
Wang X, Chen C, Qiu J. |
|
|
|
on Jan 24 |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 5 – |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 6 – |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 7 – |
|
|
|
|
|
Patient 8 – |
42 |
Temporal dynamics |
Statistical |
China |
Laboratory |
Serial interval estimated to have mean of 5.8 days and median of |
|
in viral shedding and |
modeling |
|
confirmed |
5.2 days. |
|
transmissibility of |
analysis |
|
Infectiousness started from 2.5 days before symptom onset and |
|
|
|
|
(94 cases) |
reached its peak 0.6 days before symptom onset. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proportion of transmission before symptom onset was 44%. |
|
He X, Lau EHY, Wu P, |
|
|
|
Infectiousness was estimated to decline relatively quickly within |
|
et al. |
|
|
|
7 days of illness onset. |
|
|
|
|
|
Viral shedding may begin |
|
|
|
|
|
on viral shedding before symptom onset because samples were |
|
|
|
|
|
taken on day of onset of illness. |
43 |
Serial interval of |
Statistical |
Japan, |
Primary and |
Serial interval: median of 4 days, mean of 4.7 days with SD of |
|
novel coronavirus |
modeling |
China, |
secondary cases |
2.9 days. |
|
analysis |
Germany |
of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(n=28 infected- |
The estimated median serial interval is shorter than initial |
|
Nishiura H, Linton N, |
|
|
infectee pairs) |
estimated incubation period of 5 days reported by studies. |
|
Akhmetzhanov A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
be more frequent when serial interval is shorter than incubation |
|
|
|
|
|
period. |
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA 19 |
Is
Appendix 3. Characteristic of Included Studies (continued)
No. |
Title/Author |
Study design |
Country |
Population |
Key findings |
44 |
The serial interval |
Statistical |
China |
Mean serial interval of 3.96 with SD of 4.75. |
|
|
of |
modeling |
|
(n=468) |
|
|
publicly reported |
analysis |
|
|
59/468 reports (12.6%) noted that the infectee developed |
|
confirmed cases |
|
|
|
symptoms earlier than the infector yielding negative serial intervals. |
|
Du Z, Xu X, Wu Y, |
|
|
|
Negative serial intervals suggest possibility of transmission of |
|
Wang L, Cowling BJ, |
|
|
|
asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic cases. |
|
Meyers LA |
|
|
|
Potential source bias: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data restricted to online reports of confirmed cases – rapid |
|
|
|
|
|
isolation may prevent longer serial intervals |
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution of serial intervals varies throughout an epidemic – |
|
|
|
|
|
estimates were based of reports on the outset of outbreak |
|
|
|
|
|
Identity of infector and timing of events were based on an |
|
|
|
|
|
individual’s recall of events |
|
|
|
|
|
Travel related delays in transmission |
|
|
|
|
|
Findings should be interpreted as working hypotheses regarding |
|
|
|
|
|
the infectiousness of |
|
|
|
|
|
more data become available. |
45 |
Transmission interval |
Statistical |
Singapore |
Mean incubation period: |
|
|
estimates suggest |
modelling |
Tianjin, |
clusters |
Singapore – 7.1 days (6.13, 8.25) |
|
analysis |
China |
n = 228 (93 |
Tianjin – 9 days (7.92, 10.2) |
|
|
spread of |
|
|
Singapore, |
|
|
|
|
|
135 Tianjin) |
Mean serial interval: |
|
Tindale LC, Coombe |
|
|
|
Singapore – 4.56 (2.69, 9.42) |
|
M, Stockdale JE, |
|
|
|
Tianjin – 4.22 (3.43, 5.01) |
|
Garlock ES, Lau WYV, |
|
|
|
|
|
Saraswat M, Yen- |
|
|
|
Early in outbreak, transmission of infection was on the average |
|
Hsiang BL, Zhang L, |
|
|
|
2.55 days and 2.89 days before onset of symptoms for Singapore |
|
Chen D, Wallinga J, |
|
|
|
and Tianjin respectively. |
|
Colijn C |
|
|
|
Estimated serial intervals are shorter than incubation period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
suggesting that |
|
|
|
|
|
Limitations: |
|
|
|
|
|
Times of exposure and the presumed infectors are uncertain |
|
|
|
|
|
All possible transmission configurations not captured |
|
|
|
|
|
No adjustment for truncation (shorter serial intervals are likely to |
|
|
|
|
|
be observed first) |
46 |
High proportion of |
Rapid Com- |
Brunei |
From the 138 local cases of |
|
|
asymptomatic and |
munication/ |
|
|
asymptomatic while 42 (30%) were presymptomatic. |
|
presymptomatic |
Modeling |
|
|
|
|
study |
|
|
All local transmission had contact history and the short serial |
|
|
in travelers and |
|
|
|
intervals between the |
|
returning residents |
|
|
|
presymptomatic transmission. |
|
to Brunei |
|
|
|
International arrivals to Brunei were tested and quarantined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wong J, Abdul Aziz |
|
|
|
for 14 days from which 30 were positive for |
|
ABZ, Chaw L, et al. |
|
|
|
preesymptomatic and 3 asymptomatic), which suggest that almost |
|
|
|
|
|
half of the imported cases did not present with clinical signs |
|
|
|
|
|
and symptoms upon arrival. These cases would be missed by |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA |
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
Is
Appendix 3. Characteristic of Included Studies (continued)
No. |
Title/Author |
Study design |
Country |
Population |
Key findings |
47 |
Transmission onset |
Serial model |
South Korea |
Inferred |
Estimated the median transmission onset to be 1.31 days |
|
distribution of |
(Bayesian |
|
transmission |
(standard deviation, 2.64 days) after symptom onset with peak at |
|
methods) |
|
onset time from |
0.72 days before symptom onset. |
|
|
Korea |
|
|
89 infector- |
|
|
|
|
|
infectee pairs, |
The |
|
Chun JY, Baek G, |
|
|
72 pairs were |
credible interval [CI], |
|
Kim Y. |
|
|
included in the |
|
|
|
|
|
analysis |
The median incubation period was estimated to be 2.87 days |
|
|
|
|
|
(95% CI, |
|
|
|
|
|
Median serial interval to be 3.56 days (95% CI, |
|
|
|
|
|
Results showed that the transmission of |
|
|
|
|
|
before the symptom onset, and the probability peaked as the |
|
|
|
|
|
symptom start. |
|
|
|
|
|
Among the 89 infectors, 4 cases (4.5%) were asymptomatic |
|
|
|
|
|
when diagnosed, but out of 89 infectees, 16 cases (18.0%) were |
|
|
|
|
|
asymptomatic when diagnosed. |
48 |
Estimating the |
Statistical |
Singapore |
Clusters of |
The mean generation interval was 5.20 (95%CI |
|
generation interval for |
modelling |
Tianjin, |
confirmed cases |
for Singapore and 3.95 (95%CI |
|
analysis |
China |
in Singapore and |
China based on previously reported incubation period with |
|
|
symptom onset data |
|
|
Tianjin, China |
mean 5.2 and SD 2.8 days. The proportion of |
|
|
|
|
|
transmission was 48% (95%CI |
|
Ganyani T, Kremer C, |
|
|
|
(95%CI |
|
Chen D, et al. |
|
|
|
|
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA 21 |
Is |
|
Is |
||||||||
Appendix 4. Characteristics of Clinical Trials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
No. |
Clinical Trial ID / Title |
Status |
Start and estimated |
Study design |
Country |
Population |
Intervention Group(s) |
Comparison |
Outcomes |
|
primary completion date |
Group(s) |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
1 |
NCT04318431 |
Not yet |
April 2020 – June 2020 |
France |
Asymptomatic children 6 months to 15 years |
Diagnostic Test: |
None |
Proportion of asymptomatic children or children |
||
|
|
recruiting |
|
Prospective, |
|
old (n = 600) |
Data collection and |
|
with mild respiratory symptoms within 14 days |
|
|
Prevalence of SARS |
|
|
Multicentre, |
|
|
rhinopharyngeal swab |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Observational |
|
|
|
|
Secondary: |
||
|
|
|
|
Study |
|
|
|
|
Confirmed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Confirmed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Viral load |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other respiratory viruses |
|
2 |
NCT04328129 |
Recruiting |
3/23/20 – 3/23/22 |
Prospective cohort |
French Guiana |
Primary case and family household contacts |
Diagnostic test: |
None |
Evaluation of the extent of the virus transmission |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(n = 450) |
blood sample, |
|
within households in 2 years |
|
|
Household Transmission Investigation Study for |
|
|
|
|
|
nasopharyngeal swab |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exclusion: pregnant women or breastfeeding |
|
|
Secondary |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Characterization of the secondary cases |
|
3 |
NCT04336215 |
Recruiting |
3/28/20 – 9/1/20 |
Prospective |
New Jersey, |
Adults 20 years old and above |
Diagnostic test: |
None |
Prevalence and incidence of |
|
|
|
|
|
longitudinal |
USA |
|
nasopharyngeal/throat |
|
|
|
|
Cohort Study of |
|
|
cohort study |
|
500 health care workers, |
swabs, saliva, and |
|
|
|
|
and Disease Severity in Healthcare Workers |
|
|
|
|
250 |
blood collection |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
members of participants who develop |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exclusion: previous |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pregnant, medical condition, hospitalization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in the past 30 days, fever on 1st visit |
|
|
|
|
4 |
NCT04318314 |
Recruiting |
3/18/20 – 12/31/20 |
Prospective |
London, United |
Healthy and asymptomatic healthcare |
Diagnostic Test: |
None |
Seroconversion to |
|
|
|
|
|
observational |
Kingdom |
workers 18 years old and above (n = 400) |
COPAN swabbing |
|
6 months |
|
|
|
|
cohort |
|
|
and blood sample |
|
|
||
|
Protection and Pathogenesis in |
|
|
|
|
Exclusion: |
collection |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
symptomatic healthcare workers |
|
|
|
|
5 |
NCT04320732 |
Recruiting |
3/27/20 – 3/27/22 |
Prospective Case- |
Oslo, Norway |
Adults, Hospitalized and |
No intervention, |
Hospitalized |
Rate of |
|
|
|
|
|
Control study |
|
patients/persons with |
only prospective |
patients without |
|
|
|
Risk Factors for Community- and Workplace |
|
|
|
|
of the disease and after the disease |
observation of |
|
||
|
Transmission of |
|
|
|
|
|
behavior will be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare personal or other groups with an |
conducted by |
Healthy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
increased risk of |
questionnaire |
volunteers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exclusion: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
symptomatic healthcare workers |
|
|
|
|
6 |
ChiCTR2000031252 |
Completed |
1/29/20 – 6/30/20 |
Chongqing, |
Patients with a clear history of contact |
Diagnostic: blood, |
None |
Clinical Outcomes of Asymptomatic Coronavirus |
||
|
|
recruitment |
|
Observational |
China |
with confirmed cases with two |
throat swab and |
|
Infected Patients |
|
|
Outcomes and infectivity of patients with asymptomatic |
|
|
cohort study |
|
consecutive positive nucleic acid tests |
anal swab |
|
|
|
|
novel coronavirus |
No results |
|
|
|
but no clinically relevant symptoms |
|
|
Proportion of |
|
|
|
available |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of diagnosis among those who have close contact |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with asymptomatic infection |
|
7 |
ChiCTR2000030901 |
Completed |
3/9/20 – 3/14/20 |
Case series |
Hong Kong |
All patients with laboratory confirmed |
None |
None |
Transmission dynamics of |
|
|
|
recruitment |
|
|
|
diagnosis of |
|
|
Characteristics of |
|
|
Retrospective analysis of epidemiology and transmission |
|
|
|
|
the Centre for Health Protection (CHP) |
|
|
Effectiveness of public health measures |
|
|
dynamics of patients confirmed with Coronavirus |
No results |
|
|
|
database will be included in the study |
|
|
|
|
|
Disease |
available |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA |
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA 23 |