RAPID REVIEW
Use of
Rowena Natividad S.
1Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines
2Department of Dermatology, Makati Medical Center, Makati, Philippines
4Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine and Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines
5Dela Salle University Medical Center
KEY FINDINGS
Among patients with confirmed
•There is uncertainty with regards to the safe use of
•Based on very
•There are 36 ongoing studies (21 RCTs, 1
•The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Council on Hypertension, the International Society of Hypertension (ISH) and the joint statement by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), and Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA) all caution against discontinuing
Disclaimer: The aim of these rapid reviews is to retrieve, appraise, summarize and update the available evidence on
Copyright Claims: This review is an intellectual property of the authors and of the Institute of Clinical Epidemiology, National Institutes of
BACKGROUND
When the
On the other hand, some argue that RAS antagonists may be protective for this
102 ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA |
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
This HTML is created from PDF at
Use of RAS Antagonists in Patients with Hypertension and
thereby protecting different organs against the deleterious effects of these vasoconstrictors, such as acute lung injury and adverse myocardial remodeling. When the SARS- COV viruses enter the cells, they cause downregulation of ACE2 expression, which may cause unopposed activation of RAS. RAS antagonists, therefore, are deemed beneficial in this setting.2
A recent systematic review that searched up to April 21, 2020, included five observational studies (4 retrospective cohorts and 1 prospective cohort)(N=1480) and reported a 62% reduction in odds of death (OR 0.38; 95% CI: 0.19- 0.74, I2=0%). However, there was a nonsignificant association between severe
This rapid review summarizes the available evidence on whether RAS antagonists are associated with harmful or beneficial clinical outcomes among patients with hypertension diagnosed with
METHODS
See General Methods Section.
We searched the following databases and clinical trial registries (April 28 to May 1, 2020): MEDLINE (PubMed), CENTRAL, clinicaltrials.gov, Chinese clinical trial registry, EU Clinical Trials Register, Republic of Korea
-Clinical Research Information Service, Japan Primary Registries Network/ NIPH Clinical Trials Search, ICTRP, ChinaRXIV and MedRXIV (Appendix 1). We also searched UpToDate, WHO, and CDC websites.
Articles were selected based on the following inclusion criteria:
• Population: Patients with
• Intervention:
• Comparator: Placebo, any active control, no intervention
• Outcomes: Severity of disease, death
• Study designs: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs),
The first reviewer extracted data and assessed the risk of bias while the 2nd reviewer checked for agreement. We assessed the risk of bias in the included studies using appraisal criteria for studies on harm (Painless Evidence- Based Medicine 2nd ed.).4 We discussed any disagreement and consulted a third reviewer, when necessary.
We combined studies in
for odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. We used the random effects method in
RESULTS
Description of Included studies
We found 13 retrospective cohort studies in this review; 5 of them were preprinted (Appendix
Ten studies were done in various cities in China and three in the U.S. (California, New Jersey, New York). The median sample size was 109 (range 14 to 1,129).
Thirteen studies included data for patients with confirmed
The types of ACE inhibitor and ARB were not specified in the studies. The other type of antihypertensive drugs were described as drug classes (calcium channel blockers, beta- blockers, and diuretics) in three studies (Feng 2020a; Liu 2020; Zhang 2020a) and as specific generic names (e.g., amlodipine, felodipine, lacidipine, metoprolol, bisoprolol, and spironolactone) in two studies (Liu 2020; Meng 2020). No details were given as to dose, route of administration, frequency, and duration of intake of the medications.
The severity of COVID disease was defined in different ways: seven Chinese studies followed the 5th version of guidelines from the National Health Commission but used different combinations of severity grades (ranging from mild, moderate, severe, critical). One US study reported ICU admission and disease progression to acute respiratory distress syndrome (Rubin 2020); while another US study reported the use of invasive mechanical ventilation (Richardson 2020). Seven studies reported on COVID deaths (Guo 2020; Ip 2020; Li 2020; Meng 2020; Richardson 2020; Yang 2020; Zhang 2020a), while one study reported
Risk of Bias Assessment
The appraisal of the 13 studies included in our review showed high or unclear risk of bias mainly due to the following methodologic limitations 1) not all the important
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA 103 |
This HTML is created from PDF at
Use of RAS Antagonists in Patients with Hypertension and
prognostic factors were considered, 2) inadequate follow- up period, and 3) exclusion of participants with incomplete data or outcomes (Feng 2020a; Guo 2020; Ip 2020; Richardson 2020; Zhang 2020a) (Appendix 3).
Effects of Use of RAS antagonists
We pooled the results of 10 studies that compared patients on RAS antagonists versus those on other antihypertensive drugs or no drugs.6,10 We described another 3 studies that did not provide raw data (Rubin 2020; Zhang 2020a; Zhang 2020b).7,9,11
Severe
Among patients with hypertension with confirmed
Mortality Among Patients with Hypertension on RAS Antagonists
We pooled the results from five studies to determine the association between
Three retrospective cohort studies were not pooled with the above studies due to a lack of raw data. These studies showed conflicting results. One study showed significantly lower mortality for patients on RAS antagonists (HR 0.37 [95% CI
There are 36 ongoing studies (including 21 RCTs) on RAS antagonists in
Recommendations of Organizations and Medical Groups
The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Council on Hypertension, the International Society of Hypertension (ISH) and the joint statement by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), and Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA) all caution against discontinuing
Figure 1. RAS antagonists vs Not on RAS antagonists: Severe COVID among patients with hypertension. (View in the PDF)
104 ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA |
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
This HTML is created from PDF at
Use of RAS Antagonists in Patients with Hypertension and
Figure 2. RAS antagonists vs Not on RAS antagonists: Severe COVID among patients with hypertension (Subgroup analysis based on the type of comparator). (View in the PDF)
Figure 3. RAS antagonists vs Not on RAS antagonists:
CONCLUSION
Based on very
Declaration of Conflict of Interest
No conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
1. Hoffmann M,
2.Vaduganathan M, Vardeny O, Michel T, Mcmurray JJ V, Pfeffer MA, Solomon SD.
3.Ghosal S, Mukherjee JJ, Sinha B, Gangopadhyay KK. The effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers on death and severity of disease in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA 105 |
This HTML is created from PDF at
Use of RAS Antagonists in Patients with Hypertension and
4.Loyola AB, Ibrahim I, Dans AL. Evaluation of Articles on Harm. In: Dans AL, Dans LF SM, ed. Painless
5.Feng Z, Yu Q, Yao S, Luo L, Duan J, Yan Z, et al. Early prediction of disease progression in 2019 Novel Coronavirus pneumonia patients outside Wuhan with CT and clinical characteristics. MedRxiv Prepr. 2020 February 1(138). doi:10.1101/2020.02.19.20025296
6.Liu Y, Huang F, Xu J, Yang P, Qin Y, Cao M.
7.Rubin SJS, Falkson SR, Degner N, Blish C. Clinical characteristics associated with
8.Yang G, Tan Z, Zhou L, Yang M, Peng L, Liu J, et al. Angiotensin II receptor blockers and
9.Zhang L, Sun Y, Zeng HL, Peng Y, Jiang X, Shang WJ, et al. Calcium channel blocker amlodipine besylate is associated with reduced case fatality rate of
10.Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, Crawford JM, Mcginn T, Davidson KW. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with
11.Zhang P, Zhu L, Cai J, Lei F, Qin JJ, Xie J, et al. Association of inpatient use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers with mortality among patients with hypertension hospitalized with
12.Feng Y, Ling Y, Bai T, Xie Y, Huang J, Li, J, et al.
13.Guo T, Fan Y, Chen M, Wu X, Zhang L, He T, et al. Cardiovascular implications of fatal outcomes of patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019
14.Ip A, Parikh K, Parrillo JE, Mathura S, Hansen E, Sawczuk IS, et al. Hypertension and
15.Li J, Wang X, Chen J, Zhang H, Deng A. Association of renin- angiotensin system inhibitors with severity or risk of death in patients with hypertension hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019
16.Meng J, Xiao G, Zhang J, He X, Ou M, Bi J, et al.
17.Yang G, Tan Z, Zhou L, Yang M, Peng L, Liu J, et al. Effects of ARBs And ACEIs on virus infection, inflammatory status and clinical outcomes in patients with
18.Zeng Z, Sha T, Zhang Y, Wu F, Hu H, Li H, et al. Hypertension in patients hospitalized with
19.de Simone G. Position Statement of the ESC Council on Hypertension on
20.HFSA/ACC/AHA.HFSA/ACC/AHAStatementAddressesConcerns Re: Using RAAS Antagonists in
21.International Society of Hypertension [Internet]. A statement from the International Society of Hypertension on
22.Feng Z, Li J, Yao S, Yu Q, Zhou W, Mao X, et al. The use of adjuvant therapy in preventing progression to severe pneumonia in patients with coronavirus disease 2019: A multicenter data analysis. MedRxiv Prepr. 2020; (138).
106 ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA |
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
This HTML is created from PDF at
Use of RAS Antagonists in Patients with Hypertension and
APPENDICES
Appendix 1. Literature search
|
Database |
Search strategy / search terms |
Medline |
12 #1 and #11 |
|
|
11 #2 or #3 or #4 or #5 or #6 or #7 or #8 or #9 or #10 |
|
|
10 (RAAS inhibitor) or (RAAS blocker) or (RAAS antagonist) |
|
|
9 |
(RAS inhibitor) or (RAS blocker) or (RAS antagonist) |
|
8 |
(angiotensin receptor inhibitor) or (angiotensin receptor |
|
blocker) or (angiotensin receptor antagonist) |
|
|
7 |
(angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor) or (angiotensin |
|
converting enzyme blocker) or (angiotensin converting |
|
|
enzyme antagonist) |
|
|
6 |
(Renin angiotensin system inhibitor) or (Renin angiotensin |
|
system blocker) or (Renin angiotensin system antagonist) |
|
|
5 |
(ACE blocker) or (ACE antagonist) or (ACE inhibitor) |
|
4 |
|
|
3 |
“Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists”[Mesh] |
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
“Coronavirus Infections”[Mesh] OR “Coronavirus”[Mesh] OR |
|
coronavirus OR novel coronavirus OR NCOV OR |
”[Supplementary Concept] OR covid19 OR covid 19 OR
SARS COV2 OR SARS COV 2 OR
Date and time |
|
Results |
of search |
Yield |
Eligible |
April 28, 2020 |
153 |
5 |
12:01:20 |
|
|
GMT+8 |
|
|
CENTRAL |
1 coronavirus OR novel coronavirus OR NCOV OR covid19 OR |
May 1 2020 |
16 |
6 |
|
covid 19 OR |
12:05:00 |
|
(duplicate of CTG) |
|
coronavirus 2 OR SARS2 OR SARS 2 OR SARS COV2 OR |
GMT+8 |
|
|
|
SARS COV 2 OR |
|
|
|
|
2 angiotensin |
|
|
|
|
3 #1 and #2 |
|
|
|
Trial Registries |
|
|
|
|
ClinicalTrials.gov |
COVID and angiotensin |
April 28, 2020 |
37 |
24 |
|
|
20:00:00 |
|
|
|
|
GMT+8 |
|
|
Chinese Clinical Trial |
COVID |
April 29, 2020 |
15 |
1 |
Registry |
|
10:20:00 |
|
|
|
|
GMT+8 |
|
|
EU Clinical Trials |
COVID |
April 29 ,2020 |
34 |
2 |
Register |
|
10:21:30 |
|
|
|
|
GMT+8 |
|
|
Republic of Korea - |
COVID |
April 29, 2020 |
0 |
0 |
Clinical Research |
|
10:23:00 |
|
|
Information Service |
|
GMT+8 |
|
|
Japan Primary Registries |
COVID |
April 29, 2020 |
48 |
0 |
Network / NIPH Clinical |
|
10:24:00 |
|
|
Trials Search |
|
GMT+8 |
|
|
ICTRP Database |
COVID |
May 1, 2020 |
8 |
4 |
|
10:00:00 |
|
(1, duplicate of |
|
|
|
GMT+8 |
|
ChiCTR; 2, duplicate |
|
|
|
|
of EUDRACT) |
Other databases |
|
|
|
|
Chinaxiv.org |
COVID |
April 28, 2020 |
19 |
0 |
|
|
16:20:00 |
|
|
|
|
GMT+* |
|
|
Medrxiv.org |
(covid or coronavirus) and (angiotensin) |
April 29, 2020 |
425 |
7 |
|
|
10:26:00 |
|
|
|
|
GMT+8 |
|
|
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA 107 |
This HTML is created from PDF at
Use of RAS Antagonists in Patients with Hypertension and |
|
|
Use of RAS Antagonists in Patients with Hypertension and |
|||||
Appendix 2. Characteristics of included studies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. |
Study ID/Title |
Study design |
Country |
Population |
Intervention Group(s) |
Comparison Group(s) |
Clinical Outcomes |
Key Findings |
RAS antagonists vs other antihypertensive drugs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Feng 2020a22 (preprint) |
Retrospective |
China, 9 hospitals in 7 cities |
65 adult patients with confirmed |
ACEI/ARB (n=16/65) |
Severe COVID |
Fewer hypertensive patients on ACEI/ |
|
|
|
cohort |
|
|
(calcium blockers, beta- |
|
ARB therapy developed severe pneumonia |
|
|
The Use of Adjuvant Therapy in Preventing |
|
Jan 17 to Feb 28, 2020 |
antihypertensive drugs |
|
blockers, diuretics) |
Discharge |
in contrast with those on |
|
Progression to Severe Pneumonia in |
|
(final date of |
|
|
(n=49/65) |
|
antihypertensive therapy (1 of 16 [6.3%] patients |
|
Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019: |
|
Mar 15, 2020) |
(17 were excluded due to lack of |
|
|
Deaths (not reported) |
and 16 of 49 [32.7%] patients, respectively |
|
A Multicenter Data Analysis |
|
|
data and were given amlodipine or |
|
|
|
[difference, 26.4%; 95% CI, 1.5% to 41.3%]) |
|
|
|
|
nitrendipine as needed) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of 564 consecutively hospitalized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
patients: Median age = 47 years (IQR, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
were men. 132 (23.4%) patients had |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
comorbidities, (including hypertension: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n = 82 [14.5%]; DM 8%; CVD 3.9%)) |
|
|
|
|
2 |
Feng 2020b12 |
Retrospective |
China |
95 patients w/ HTN and on |
ACEI/ARB (n=33/95) |
Other antiHTN drugs |
Disease severity (Moderate, |
Compared with severe and critical groups, there were |
|
|
cohort |
|
antiHTN drugs |
|
(n=62/95) |
severe, critical) (5th version of |
more patients taking ACEI/ARB in moderate group. |
|
|
Admitted to 3 hospitals in |
|
|
|
the guidelines issued by the |
There was a significant difference in angiotensin- |
|
|
A |
|
Wuhan, Shanghai and Anhui |
476 patients with |
|
|
National Health Commission |
converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor |
|
|
|
|
(24%) w/HTN; 205 patients (43.1%) |
|
|
of China on Diagnosis and |
blockers usage among patients with different severities. |
|
|
|
Jan 1 to Feb 15, 2020 (End |
w/ comorbidities; median age, 53 |
|
|
Treatment of |
|
|
|
|
of data collection: Feb 15) |
years [IQR, |
|
|
|
|
3 Meng 202016 |
Retrospective |
China (Shenzhen) |
42 patients with |
|
cohort |
|
with hypertension AND on anti- |
|
Hospitalized |
hypertensives; Median age = 64.5 yrs. |
|
improve the clinical outcomes of |
|
|
(range, |
|
Jan 11 to Feb 23, 2020 |
but 9 not on antiHTN drugs) (out of |
|
|
|
|
417 admitted patients) |
ACE inhibitors or ARB, |
|
diff doses (n=17/42) |
drugs (e.g., amlodipine, |
|
|
|
lacidipine, metoprolol, |
|
bisoprolol, spironolactone) |
|
(n=25/42) |
Severe disease (National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China)
Deaths
“We observed that patients receiving ACEI or ARB therapy had a lower rate of severe diseases. This evidence supports the benefit of using ACEIs or ARBs to potentially contribute to the improvement of clinical outcomes of
RAS antagonists vs Not on RAS antagonists
4 Guo 202013 |
Retrospective |
China (Wuhan) |
61 |
|
cohort |
Hospitalized at designated |
hypertension (33%; out of 187); |
Cardiovascular Implications of Fatal |
|
COVID hospital; |
Mean age (SD) = 58.5 yrs. (14.66) |
Outcomes of Patients With Coronavirus |
|
Jan 23 to Feb 23, 2020 |
Either discharged or died during |
Disease 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
hospitalization (NOT includes those |
|
|
|
still admitted); Excluded 67 patients |
|
|
|
who were not yet discharged or died) |
ACEI/ARB (n=14/61) |
|
(n=47/61) |
Acute respiratory distress |
|
|
|
syndrome (not reported) |
|
Malignant arrhythmia |
|
(not reported) |
|
Acute myocardial injury |
“The mortality rates of patients with and without use of
5 |
Ip 202014 |
Retrospective |
US (NJ) |
1129 w/ HTN and known outcomes |
ACEI/ARB |
Discharged or died |
The mortality rates were lower for hypertensive |
|
|
|
cohort |
|
|
(n=460/1129) |
(n=669/1129) |
|
patients prescribed ACE1 (27%, p=0.001) or ARBs |
|
Hypertension and |
|
Admitted to hospitals |
1584 w/ HTN (52.5% of 3017 |
|
|
|
(33%, p=0.12) compared to other |
|
Aldosterone System Inhibitors in |
|
within Hackensack |
hospitalized |
|
|
|
agents (39%) in the unadjusted analyses. RAAS |
|
Patients with |
|
Meridian Health network |
|
|
|
|
inhibitor therapy appeared protective compared to |
|
|
|
Convenience sampling |
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discharged or deceased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cohort with known outcomes |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
Li 202015 |
Retrospective |
China (Hubei) |
362 patients with HTN and |
ACEIs/ARBs |
Severe disease (diagnosis |
The current findings did not identify an association |
|
|
|
cohort |
|
|
(n=115/362) |
(n=247/362) |
and treatment scheme |
between treatment with ACEIs/ARBs and either |
|
Association of |
|
Admitted to Central |
259 (71.5%) were older than 60 years; |
|
|
for |
severity or clinical outcomes of |
|
Inhibitors With Severity or Risk of Death in |
|
Hospital of Wuhan |
52.2% men |
|
|
[5th edition]) |
hospitalizations in patients with hypertension. |
|
Patients With Hypertension Hospitalized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Coronavirus Disease 2019 |
|
Jan 15 to Mar 15, 2020 |
|
|
|
Deaths |
|
|
Infection in Wuhan, China |
|
(End of study not stated) |
|
|
|
|
|
7 Yang 2020a17 |
Retrospective |
China (Hubei) |
126 |
ARBs/ACEIs |
1. Severe COVID |
|
|
cohort |
|
preexisting hypertension |
(n=43/126) |
(n=83/126) |
(5th Trial Version of the Chinese |
Effects of ARBs And ACEIs On Virus Infection, |
|
Hubei Provincial Hospital of |
|
|
|
National Health Commission) |
Inflammatory Status And Clinical Outcomes |
|
Traditional Chinese Medicine |
Median age, 66 (IQR, |
|
|
2. Deaths |
In |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Single Center Retrospective Study |
|
Jan 5 to Feb 22, 2020 |
|
|
|
|
“Furthermore, much lower proportion of critical patients (9.3% vs 22.9%; p=0.061), and a lower death rate (4.7% vs 13.3%; p=0.216) were observed in ARBs/ ACEIs group than
Our findings thus support the use of ARBs/ACEIs in
108 ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA |
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA 109 |
This HTML is created from PDF at
Use of RAS Antagonists in Patients with Hypertension and |
|
Use of RAS Antagonists in Patients with Hypertension and |
|||
No. Study ID/Title |
Study design Country |
Population |
Intervention Group(s) Comparison Group(s) |
Clinical Outcomes |
Key Findings |
8Zeng 202018
Hypertension in patients hospitalized with
Retrospective China (Wuhan) cohort
Admitted to Hankou Hospital
Jan 5 and Mar 8, 2020 (Minimum 14 days
75 with hypertension
Mean age (SD), 67(11); 55% M)
(27%, out of 274 patients with clinically confirmed
ACEI/ARB (n=28/75) |
|||
On |
(n=47/75) |
Severity of pneumonia |
|
|
|||
(n= 7/28, 25%) |
On |
Length of hospital stay |
|
On CCB |
(n=12/47, 25%) |
||
|
Discharge rate from hospital |
||
(n= 8/28, 29%) |
On CCB (n=41/47, 87%) |
||
|
|||
On diuretics |
On diuretics (n=0) |
Hospitalization |
|
|
|||
(n = 4/28, 14%) |
|
|
Patients with hypertension who had previously taken ACEI/ARB drugs for antihypertensive treatment have an increased tendency to develop severe pneumonia after infection with
9 Zhang 2020b11 |
Retrospective |
China (Hubei province) |
1128 adult patients with hypertension |
ACEI/ARB group |
Among hospitalized |
||
|
cohort |
|
diagnosed with |
(n=188/1128) |
(n=940/1128) |
|
hypertension, inpatient use of ACEI/ARB was |
Association of Inpatient Use of Angiotensin |
|
Admitted to 9 hospitals |
|
|
|
Septic shock |
associated with lower risk of |
Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin |
|
|
|
Median age 64 |
Median age 64 [IQR |
|
compared with ACEI/ARB |
II Receptor Blockers with Mortality Among |
|
Dec 31, 2019 to Feb 20, 2020 |
|
[IQR |
53.5% men) |
DIC |
interpretation needs to consider the potential for |
Patients With Hypertension Hospitalized |
|
|
|
53.2% men) |
|
|
residual confounders, it is unlikely that |
With |
|
Final date of |
|
|
|
*Only reported HR, |
use of ACEI/ARB was associated with an increased |
|
|
Mar 7, 2020 |
|
|
|
not raw data |
mortality risk. |
RAS antagonists vs other antihypertensive drugs or no drugs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 Liu 2020a (preprint)6 |
Retrospective China (Shenzhen) |
|
cohort |
Antihypertensive Angiotensin II |
Admitted to 3 hospitals |
receptor blockers associated to mitigation of |
|
disease severity in elderly |
Jan 11 to Feb 5, 2020; Wuhan, |
|
Jan 12 to Feb 9, 2020; Beijing, |
|
Dec 27, 2019 to Feb 29, 2020 |
78 adult patients with |
ACEI or ARB |
|
and hypertension; |
(n=22/78) |
(CCB or Thiazide or BB) |
Average age = 65.2 yrs. (10.7) |
|
(n=39/78) |
|
|
No drug (n=17/78) |
Mild versus Severe COVID (New Coronavirus Pneumonia Prevention and Control Program published by the National Health Commission of China)
“No statistical difference in disease severity between any of the 5 different types of
11 |
Richardson 202010 |
|
USA (NY) |
1366 patients with HTN (24%) |
ACEI/ARB |
Not on ACEI/ARB |
Invasive mechanical |
Mortality rates for patients |
|
|
Retrospective |
|
(out of 2411 with home medication |
(n=413/1366) |
(n =953/1366) |
ventilation, kidney replacement |
with hypertension not taking an ACEI or ARB, taking |
|
Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, |
cohort |
Admitted to 12 hospitals in |
information out of 2634 who were |
|
*unspecified how many |
therapy, and death. |
an ACEI and taking an ARB were 26.7%, 32.7%, and |
|
and Outcomes Among 5700 Patients |
|
New York City, Long Island, |
discharged or died; out of 5700 |
|
were on other antiHTN |
|
30.6%, respectively. |
|
Hospitalized With |
|
and Westchester County, New |
sequentially hospitalized patients |
|
or no drugs |
|
(...results are unadjusted for known confounders, |
|
New York City Area |
|
York, within the Northwell |
with |
|
|
|
including age, sex, race, ethnicity, |
|
|
|
Health system. Mar 1 and |
|
|
|
|
status indicators, and comorbidities such as diabetes, |
|
|
|
Apr 4, 2020 |
Median age, 63 years [IQR, |
|
|
|
chronic kidney disease, and heart failure). |
|
|
|
Most patients in this study |
range, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
were still in hospital at the |
HTN (56.6%), obesity (41.7%), and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
study end point (3066, 53.8%). diabetes (33.8%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Median no. of medications, 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(IQR |
|
|
|
|
12 |
Rubin 2020 (preprint)7 |
Retrospective |
USA (California) |
14 w/ HTN (26%, out of 54 |
ACEI or ARB (n=9/14) |
Progression to severe disease |
“In our study, history of |
|
|
|
cohort |
|
|
no drug use (?) (n=5/14) |
1. Recommendation for further |
diagnosis rate or predispose patients to worse disease |
|
|
Clinical characteristics associated with |
|
Stanford Hospital (OPD & |
past medical history documentation; |
|
|
hospital care |
outcomes. However, our study is underpowered to |
|
|
inpatient) |
18 inpatients, 36 outpatients) |
|
|
2. Admission to ICU |
draw definitive conclusions from such negative data.” |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Diagnosis of pneumonia |
|
|
|
|
by Mar 16, 2020 |
Median 53.5 yrs. [IQR, 32.75; range, |
|
|
4. Progression to ARDS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No raw data; Reported only as |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
multivariate analysis |
|
13Zhang 2020a (Apr 8 preprint)14
Calcium channel blocker amlodipine besylate is associated 1 with reduced case 2 fatality rate of
Retrospective |
China |
cohort |
Admitted to 2 hospitals: |
|
|
In vitro anti- |
Tongji Hospital from Jan 17 |
viral testing |
to Feb 14, 2020 |
|
Union Hospital from Jan 10 |
|
to Mar 30, 2020 |
90 patients, who only had hypertension as the comorbidity and were either discharged from the hospital or deceased (out of 487 adult
Median 67 yrs.
Various |
Amlodipine besylate |
Deaths |
Calcium channel blockers (CCB) can significantly inhibit |
antihypertensive |
(n=44/90) |
|
the |
drugs (including ARBs, |
|
*No raw data, only reported HR |
in vitro. Comparison with two other major types of |
ACEIs, |
Nifedipine (n=16/90), |
|
|
thiazide) (n=17/90) |
|
|
enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin II receptor |
|
Other CCBs (n=4/90) |
|
blockers (ARB), showed that only CCBs display |
|
No antiHTN drug (n=9/90) |
|
significant |
|
|
|
COVID, Coronavirus disease; ACEI, Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, Angiotensin receptor blocker; HTN, Hypertension; CCB, Calcium channel blocker;
110 ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA |
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA 111 |
This HTML is created from PDF at
Use of RAS Antagonists in Patients with Hypertension and
Appendix 3. Summary of Risk of Bias Appraisal for Studies on Harm
|
|
1. Did the |
2. Were important prognostic |
3. Were unbiased |
4. Were unbiased |
|
|
|
exposure in |
factors balanced at the |
criteria used |
criteria used |
5. Was the |
|
Study ID |
question precede |
time of exposure? If not, |
to determine |
to detect the |
|
|
|
the undesirable |
were statistical adjustments |
exposure in |
outcome in |
adequate? |
|
|
outcome? |
made for these factors? |
all patients? |
all patients? |
|
1 |
Feng 2020 Apr 8 preprint |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
N |
2 |
Feng 2020 Apr 10 |
Y |
N, No statistical adjustment |
Y |
Y |
N |
3 |
Guo 2020 |
Y |
N, No statistical adjustment |
Y |
Y |
N |
4 |
Ip 2020 Apr 24 preprint |
UC |
N |
Y |
Y |
N |
5 |
Li 2020 |
Y |
Y |
UC |
Y |
UC |
6 |
Liu 2020 Mar 20 preprint |
Y |
UC |
Y |
Y |
N |
7 |
Meng 2020 |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
N |
8 |
Richardson 2020 |
Y |
N, no statistical adjustment |
Y |
Y |
N |
9 |
Rubin 2020 Mar 27 preprint |
Y |
Y |
Y |
N |
N |
10 |
Yang 2020 |
Y |
UC |
Y |
Y |
N |
11 |
Zeng 2020 Apr 6 preprint |
Y |
N, No statistical adjustment |
Y |
Y |
Y |
12 |
Zhang 2020 |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
13 |
Zhang 2020 Apr8 preprint |
Y |
Y |
N |
Y |
Y |
Y, Yes; N, No; U, Unclear
Appendix 4. Subgroup and Sensitivity Analyses
Figure 1. RAS antagonist vs Not on RAS antagonist: Severe COVID (Subgroup analysis based on country).
112 ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA |
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
This HTML is created from PDF at
Use of RAS Antagonists in Patients with Hypertension and
Figure 2. RAS antagonist vs Not on RAS antagonist: Severe COVID (Subgroup analysis based on definition of severity).
Figure 3. RAS antagonist vs Not on RAS antagonist: Severe COVID (Subgroup analysis based on inclusion only of patients with known outcomes, i.e., discharged or died).
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA 113 |
This HTML is created from PDF at
Use of RAS Antagonists in Patients with Hypertension and |
|
|
|
|
Use of RAS Antagonists in Patients with Hypertension and |
|||||
Appendix 5. Characteristics of Ongoing Trials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Start and |
|
|
|
|
Intervention |
|
|
No. |
Clinical Trial ID / Title |
Status |
estimated primary |
Study design |
Country |
|
Population |
Comparison Group(s) |
Clinical Outcomes |
|
|
Group(s) |
|||||||||
|
|
|
completion date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
NCT04330300 |
Recruiting |
Mar 30, 2020 to |
RCT, |
Ireland |
|
Men and |
Continue |
Alternative |
Primary: Death |
|
|
|
Jan 31, 2021 |
(N=2414) |
|
|
over with known diagnosis of hypertension, |
ACEi/ARB |
Switch to an alternative BP medication |
mortality) |
|
CORONAvirus Angiotensin Converting Enzyme |
|
|
|
|
|
currently using ACEi or ARB for the |
antihypertensive |
(specifically a Calcium channel blocker |
Secondary: Intubation in |
|
Inhibitors/Angiotensin Receptor Blockers InvestigatiON: |
|
|
|
|
|
treatment of hypertension and |
|
[CCB] or |
ICU; Hospitalization for non- |
|
A Randomized Clinical Trial (CORONACION) |
|
|
|
|
|
naïve (i.e. not known to be infected) |
|
at an equipotent blood pressure lowering |
invasive ventilation (NIV) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dose). The choice of either CCB or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
provided as alternative therapy will be at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the discretion of the physician |
|
2 |
NCT04338009 |
Enrolling by |
Mar 31 to |
RCT (N=152) |
Pennsylvania, USA |
|
18 y/o hospitalized |
Continuation |
Discontinuation of ACEI/ARB |
Primary: Global rank score |
|
|
invitation |
Dec 31, 2020 |
|
|
|
or confirmed with PCR on prior outpatient |
of ACEI/ARB |
|
based on (1) time to death, |
|
Elimination or Prolongation of ACE Inhibitors and ARB |
|
|
|
|
|
use of ACEI or ARB |
|
|
(2) no. of days on IMV or |
|
in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (REPLACECOVID) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECMO, (3) no. of days on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
renal replacement therapy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or pressor/inotropic therapy, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and (4) a modified sequential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organ Failure Assessment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(SOFA) score. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secondary: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Length of hospital stay; Length |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of ICU stay; AUC SOFA |
3 |
NCT04351581 |
Recruiting |
Apr to Dec 2020 |
RCT (N=215) |
Copenhagen, |
|
Verified |
Continuation |
Discontinuation of ACEi/ARB |
Primary: Days alive and out of |
|
|
|
|
|
Denmark |
|
Daily administration of |
of ACEi/ARB |
|
hospital |
|
Effects of Discontinuing |
|
|
|
|
|
therapy; Age 18 years and above |
|
|
Secondary: Worsening of |
|
System Inhibitors in Patients With |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
insufficiency; Referral to ICU, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
NCT04353596 |
Recruiting |
Apr 15 , 2020 to May |
RCT (N=208) |
Innsbruck, Austria |
|
Proven and symptomatic |
Continuation |
Discontinuation of ACEi/ARB |
Primary: Combination of |
|
|
|
15, 2021 |
|
|
|
infection ≤ 5 days; Age ≥ 18 years; |
of ACEi/ARB |
|
maximum Sequential Organ |
|
Stopping |
|
|
|
|
|
Chronic (≥ 1 month) ACEI/ARB therapy |
|
|
Failure Assessment (SOFA) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for treatment of arterial hypertension, |
|
|
Score and death |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
diabetes mellitus, heart failure or coronary |
|
|
Secondary: Maximum SOFA, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
artery disease; Stable hemodynamic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
conditions allowing to stop or continue |
|
|
replacement therapy, etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
treatment with ACEI/ARB (systolic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
blood pressure ≤180mmHg) |
|
|
|
5 |
NCT04360551 |
Not yet |
Jul 1, 2020 to |
RCT (N=40) |
Hawaii, USA |
|
Male or |
Telmisartan |
Placebo |
Primary: Maximum clinical |
|
|
recruiting |
Jun 30, 2021 |
|
|
|
≥18 y/o; Has |
|
|
severity of disease |
|
Pilot Clinical Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of |
|
|
|
|
|
acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 |
|
|
Secondary: treatment |
|
Telmisartan for the Mitigation of Pulmonary and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
emergent adverse events |
|
|
Cardiac Complications in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
NCT04340557 |
Recruiting |
Mar 27 to |
RCT (N=200) |
California, USA |
|
Confirmed |
Standard of |
Standard of care plus losartan |
Primary: Mechanical |
|
|
|
Oct 6 2020 |
|
|
|
Mild to moderate respiratory disease |
Care plus an ARB |
|
ventilation |
|
Do Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Mitigate |
|
|
|
|
|
defined by oxygen requirement of at least |
|
|
Secondary: ICU transfer; |
|
Progression to Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome |
|
|
|
|
|
2 L/min to maintain oxygen saturation level |
|
|
Oxygen therapy |
|
With |
|
|
|
|
|
≥92%; Systolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mmHg; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Age ≥18 years old |
|
|
|
7 |
NCT04351724 |
Recruiting |
Apr 16 to |
RCT (N=500) |
Vienna, Austria |
|
Laboratory confirmed infection |
Candesartan |
Primary: Sustained |
|
|
|
|
Dec 1, 2020 |
|
|
|
with |
|
|
improvement (>48h) of one |
|
Austrian CoronaVirus Adaptive Clinical Trial |
|
|
|
|
|
randomization; Hospitalisation due to |
|
Others: |
point on the WHO Scale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chloroquine or Hydroxychloroquine |
Secondary: Time to |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
treatment arms); oxygen saturation <94% |
|
Lopinavir/Ritonavir |
improvement on the WHO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
when breathing room air or >3% drop in |
|
Best standard of care |
scale, time to discharge or a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case of chronic obstructive lung disease |
|
Clazakizumab |
National Early Warning Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Placebo for clazakizumab |
(NEWS) ≤2, Oxygenation free |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rivaroxaban |
days, etc |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thromboprophylaxis |
|
8 |
NCT04355936 |
Recruiting |
Apr 1 to |
RCT (N=400) |
Buenos Aires, |
|
Aged 18 years or older w/ confirmed |
Telmisartan + |
Standard of care |
Primary: Need for |
|
Telmisartan for Treatment of |
|
Oct 2020 |
|
Argentina |
|
diagnosis of |
Standard of care |
|
supplementary oxygen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
114 |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA |
|
|
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
|
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
|
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA 115 |
This HTML is created from PDF at
Use of RAS Antagonists in Patients with Hypertension and |
|
|
|
Use of RAS Antagonists in Patients with Hypertension and |
||||||
|
|
|
Start and |
|
|
|
Intervention |
|
|
|
No. |
Clinical Trial ID / Title |
Status |
estimated primary |
Study design |
Country |
Population |
Comparison Group(s) |
Clinical Outcomes |
||
Group(s) |
||||||||||
|
|
|
completion date |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
9 |
NCT04345406 |
Not yet |
Apr 15 to |
RCT (N=60) |
Tanta, Egypt |
Patients infected with COVID 19 |
ACEIs |
Conventional treatment |
Primary: number of patients |
|
|
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Treatment |
recruiting |
Dec 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
with virological cure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
of Covid 19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
NCT04335786 |
Recruiting |
Apr to Jul 2020 |
RCT (N=651) |
Adult (age ≥ 18 years); admitted to the |
Valsartan (Diovan) |
Placebo oral tablet |
Primary: ICU admission, |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Arnhem, |
hospital of any participating center; |
|
|
mechanical ventilation or |
|
|
Valsartan for Prevention of Acute Respiratory Distress |
|
|
|
Netherlands |
confirmed |
|
|
death |
|
|
Syndrome in Hospitalized Patients With |
|
|
|
|
either: positive laboratory test for SARS- |
|
|
Secondary: Acute Kidney |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
injury |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
for |
|
|
|
|
11 |
NCT04328012 |
Recruiting |
Apr 2020 to |
RCT (N=4000) |
New York, USA |
Hospitalized patient w/ laboratory |
Losartan |
Lopinavir/ritonavir |
Primary: National Institute |
|
|
|
|
Jan 2021 |
|
|
confirmation of |
|
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate |
of Allergy and Infectious |
|
|
COVID MED Trial - Comparison Of Therapeutics for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Placebo |
Diseases |
|
|
Hospitalized Patients Infected With |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severity Scale (NCOSS) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secondary: Hospital length |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of stay, ICU, Mechanical |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ventilation, Survival |
|
12 |
NCT04312009 |
Recruiting |
Apr 2020 to |
RCT (N=200) |
Minnesota, USA |
Presumptive positive laboratory test |
Losartan |
Placebo |
Primary: Difference in |
|
|
|
|
Apr 2021 |
|
|
for |
|
|
Estimated (PEEP adjusted) |
|
|
Losartan for Patients With |
|
|
|
|
standard; admission to the hospital |
|
|
P/F Ratio at 7 days |
|
|
Hospitalization |
|
|
|
|
with a respiratory Sequential Organ |
|
|
Secondary: Daily Hypotensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Failure Assessment (SOFA) score ≥1 and |
|
|
Episodes, Hypotension |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
increased oxygen requirement compared |
|
|
Requiring Vasopressors, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to baseline among those on home O2 |
|
|
Acute Kidney Injury, etc. |
|
13 |
NCT04311177 |
Recruiting |
Apr 2020 to |
RCT (N=580) |
Minnesota, USA |
Positive laboratory test for |
Losartan |
Placebo |
Primary: Hospital admission |
|
|
|
|
Apr 2021 |
|
|
based on local laboratory standard; Upper |
|
|
Secondary: PROMIS |
|
|
Losartan for Patients With |
|
|
|
|
respiratory symptoms (cough, rhinorrhea) |
|
|
Dyspnea Functional |
|
|
Hospitalization |
|
|
|
|
or fever (>101.5) |
|
|
Limitations, PROMIS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dyspnea Severity, Daily |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Temperature, etc. |
|
14 |
NCT04359953 |
Not yet |
Apr 2020 to |
RCT (N=1600) |
Strasbourg, France |
Age ≥ 75, or ≥ 60 if dementia; infected with |
Telmisartan |
Drug: Hydroxychloroquine |
Primary: |
|
|
|
recruiting |
Jun 2021 |
|
|
COVID 19 (confirmed by |
|
Drug: Azithromycin |
rate |
|
|
Efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine, Telmisartan and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secondary: Rate of death, |
||
|
Azithromycin on the Survival of Hospitalized Elderly |
|
|
|
|
and clinical picture); clinical manifestation |
|
|
Hypotension, Hypothermia |
|
|
Patients With |
|
|
|
|
of COVID 19 requiring hospitalization: |
|
|
or hyperthermia, Pneumonia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pneumopathy and/or upper airway |
|
|
severity, etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
infection and/or respiratory distress, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
confusion and/or encephalopathy and/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or signs of encephalitis, walking disorders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with ataxia and/or falls, digestive problem |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(diarrhea and/or vomiting); affiliated to a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
social health insurance scheme |
|
|
|
|
15 |
NCT04343001 |
Not yet |
Apr 2020 to |
RCT (N=10,000) |
London, UK |
Adults age 40 years and older; with |
Losartan |
Aspirin |
Primary: Death |
|
|
|
recruiting |
Apr 2021 |
|
|
suspected or confirmed acute |
|
Simvastatin |
Secondary: Myocardial |
|
|
Coronavirus Response - Active Support for |
|
|
|
|
infection. Acute |
|
|
infarction, Congestive |
|
|
Hospitalised |
|
|
|
|
is suspected in the presence of a fever |
|
|
cardiac failure, Severe cardiac |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and at least one symptom of respiratory |
|
|
arrhythmia, etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
disease e.g. cough, difficulty breathing, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
signs of hypoxia. The clinician may suspect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
in or has recently travelled to an area with |
|
|
|
116 ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA |
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA 117 |
This HTML is created from PDF at
Use of RAS Antagonists in Patients with Hypertension and |
|
|
|
|
Use of RAS Antagonists in Patients with Hypertension and |
||||||
|
|
|
Start and |
|
|
|
|
Intervention |
|
|
|
No. |
Clinical Trial ID / Title |
Status |
estimated primary |
Study design |
Country |
Population |
Comparison Group(s) |
Clinical Outcomes |
|||
Group(s) |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
completion date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
16 |
NCT04349410 |
Enrolling by |
Apr to Oct 2020 |
RCT (N=500) |
California, USA |
Drug: Losartan |
Drug: Hydroxychloroquine, Azithromycin |
Primary: Improvement in |
|||
|
|
invitation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drug: Hydroxychloroquine, Doxycycline |
FMTVDM Measurement with |
|
|
The Fleming [FMTVDM] Directed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drug: Hydroxychloroquine, Clindamycin |
nuclear imaging |
|
|
Treatment Protocol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drug: Hydroxychloroquine, Clindamycin, |
Secondary: Ventilator status, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primaquine - low dose. |
Survival status |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drug: Hydroxychloroquine, Clindamycin, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primaquine - high dose. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drug: Remdesivir |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drug: Tocilizumab |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drug: Methylprednisolone |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drug: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drug: Convalescent Serum |
|
|
17 |
NCT04355429 |
Not yet |
May to Jul 2020 |
RCT (N=230) |
Paris, France |
Hospitalization for acute respiratory failure |
Captopril |
Standard care |
Primary: |
||
|
|
recruiting |
|
|
|
requiring oxygen administration ≥3L/mn; |
|
|
free survival |
||
|
Efficacy of Captopril in |
|
|
|
|
Age > 18 years or older; Presence of |
|
|
|
||
|
Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) |
|
|
|
|
pneumonia; PCR |
|
|
|
||
|
(CAPTOCOVID) |
|
|
|
|
any biological sample in the last 7 days; |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patient affiliated to social security regime |
|
|
|
||
18 |
NCT04356495 |
Not yet |
Apr to Jul 2020 |
RCT (N=1057) |
Bordeaux, France |
Positive |
Telmisartan |
Dietary Supplement: Vitamins |
Primary: Hospitalization, Death |
||
|
|
recruiting |
|
|
|
test on nasopharyngeal swab; Onset |
|
Hydroxychloroquine |
Secondary: ICU, loss of |
||
|
Treatments to Decrease the Risk of Hospitalization |
|
|
|
|
of symptoms < 72 hours prior to naso- |
|
Imatinib |
autonomy evaluated by the |
||
|
or Death in Elderly Outpatients With Symptomatic |
|
|
|
|
pharyngeal swab sampling; Age ≥ 65 years; |
|
Favipiravir |
ADL and IADL scale |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Valid, ambulatory person, fully capable |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
of understanding the challenges of |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
the trial; No hospitalization criteria |
|
|
|
||
19 |
EudraCT Number- |
Ongoing |
Registered |
RCT (N=1600) |
Strasbourg, France |
Male or female age ≥ 75, or ≥ 60 if |
Telmisartan |
Azithromycin |
Primary: |
||
|
|
|
Mar 29, 2020 |
|
|
dementia; infected with COVID 19 |
|
Hydroxychloroquine, |
Secondary: Serious adverse |
||
|
Efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine, Telmisartan and |
|
|
|
|
(confirmed by |
|
|
events rate; SARS |
||
|
Azithromycin on Survival in Elderly Hospitalized Patients |
|
|
|
|
detectable less than 5 days old and clinical |
|
|
|||
|
with |
|
|
|
|
picture); Clinical manifestation of COVID 19 |
|
|
|||
|
Blinded Study |
|
|
|
|
requiring hospitalization; Subject affiliated |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
to a social health insurance scheme |
|
|
|
||
20 |
EudraCT Number- |
Ongoing |
Registered |
RCT (N=641) |
Nijmegen, |
Adult (age ≥ 18 years) |
Valsartan |
Placebo |
Primary: either: |
||
|
|
|
Mar 30, 2020 |
|
Netherlands |
• |
Admitted to the hospital of any |
|
|
1) ICU admission; |
|
|
A |
|
|
|
|
|
participating center |
|
|
2) Mechanical ventilation; |
|
|
clinical trial with valsartan for PRevention of Acute |
|
|
|
|
• |
Confirmed |
|
|
3) Death, within 14 days |
|
|
rEspiraTORy dIstress syndrome in hospitAlized patieNts |
|
|
|
|
|
either: positive laboratory test for SARS- |
|
|
Secondary: Death within |
|
|
with |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 days, 90 days and 1 year |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for |
|
|
|
|
21 |
IRCT20151113025025N3 |
Recruiting |
Apr to Sep 2020 |
RCT (N=60) |
Tehran, Iran |
Patients who have suggestive signs |
Continuation |
Discontinuation of RAAS inhibitors and |
Primary: Death, ICU |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
of |
of RAAS |
shift to calcium blocker or |
|
||
|
Clinical Trial of |
|
|
|
|
tomography scan, reported by a radiologist. |
inhibitors |
|
|
||
|
inhibitors with halting their administration and the |
|
|
|
|
Patients consuming |
|
|
|
||
|
effect on clinical outcomes of patients with corona virus |
|
|
|
|
enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
receptor blockers |
|
|
|
|||
|
in 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118 ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA |
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA 119 |
This HTML is created from PDF at