RAPID REVIEW
Should Colchicine be used
in the treatment of
Maria Vanessa
Asia Pacific Center for Evidence Based Healthcare, Manila, Philippines
This rapid review summarizes the available evidence on the efficacy and safety of Colchicine in
treating patients with
KEY FINDINGS
There is currently insufficient evidence on the use of colchicine in the treatment of
•Colchicine is an
•Its powerful
•There are currently no evidence for its use on
•Common adverse events include gastrointestinal effects such as diarrhea but does not exhibit serious and
•There is no mention of colchicine in the WHO Interim Guidance, US CDC Clinical Interim Guidelines and Chinese Clinical Guidance for
Disclaimer: The aim of these rapid reviews is to retrieve, appraise, summarize and update the available evidence on
Copyright Claims: This review is an intellectual property of the authors and of the Institute of Clinical Epidemiology, National Institutes of
BACKGROUND
Colchicine is perhaps one of the oldest drugs in use today dating back since 1820.1 It has been approved by the FDA for use on gout flares, Behcet’s disease and Familial Mediterranean Fever,1,2
Colchicine has a unique
The use of colchicine for gout has already been well established4 with a strong recommendation based on high quality evidence for clinicians to use it in acute gout.5 Its use on
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA 37 |
Should Colchicine be used in the treatment of
In Familial Mediterranean Fever, colchicine appears to reduce the number of people experiencing attacks, but well designed and robust randomized controlled trials are still needed for a more comprehensive concusion.8 The Food and Drug Administration has approved colchicine use for these three indications, though only for gout does it seem to have high quality of evidence.
In recent years, Colchicine has been studied for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Initially it was seen to reduce rates of recurrent pericarditis and
Adverse events during oral colchicine use were also explored in a recent systematic review of randomized controlled trials.14 Methodologic quality was noted to be high on assessment of the primary studies. The meta- analysis showed that colchicine increases the rate of diarrhea and gastrointestinal adverse events. It did not observe an increase in the rate of liver, sensory, muscle, infectious or hematology adverse event and even death.
Clinical trials that investigate the efficacy and safety of colchicine for
This rapid review summarizes the available evidence on the efficacy and safety of colchicine in treating patients with
METHODS
See General Methods Section.
Articles were selected based on the following inclusion criteria:
•Population:
•Intervention: Colchicine any dose, any duration
•Comparator: placebo, any active control, no intervention
•Outcomes: mortality, complications, respiratory distress, adverse events, length of hospitalization
•Study designs: randomized controlled trials (RCTs),
RESULTS
Characteristics of Included Studies
There are currently no studies or clinical trials specifically answering the question on whether colchicine can be used
for the treatment of
The interventions for the trials include colchicine on top of standard therapy compared to current standard therapy, except for COLCORONA where colchicine is compared to placebo. COLCORONA includes
Recommendations from Other Guidelines
There are currently no specific recommendations for the use of colchicine for
CONCLUSION
Although its use as an
Declaration of Conflict of Interest
No conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
1.Yan BP, Tan GM. What’s old is new again - a review of the current evidence of colchicine in cardiovascular medicine. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2017;
2.Katsanos AH, Palaiodimou L, Price C, Giannopoulos S, Lemmens R, Kosmidou M, et al. Colchicine for stroke prevention in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review and
3.Leung YY, Yao Hui LL, Kraus VB. Colchicine — Update on mechanisms of action and therapeutic uses. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015;
4.Shekelle PG, Newberry SJ, FitzGerald JD, Motala A, O'Hanlon CE, Tariq A, et al. Management of gout: a systematic review in support of an American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline. Ann Intern Med.
5.Qaseem A, Harris RP, Forciea MA for the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. Management of acute and recurrent gout: A clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2017;
38 |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA |
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
Should Colchicine be used in the treatment of
6.Nava F, Ghilotti F, Maggi L, Hatemi G, Del Bianco A, Merlo C, et al. Biologics, colchicine, corticosteroids, immunosuppressants and
7.Saenz A, Ausejo M, Shea B, Wells G, Welch V, Tugwell P. Pharmacotherapy for Behcet's syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000; (2):CD001084.
8.Wu B, Xu T, Li Y, Yin X. Interventions for reducing inflammation in familial Mediterranean fever. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 10:CD010893. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010893.pub3.
9.Verma S, Eikelboom JW, Nidorf SM,
10.Adler Y, Charron P, Imazio M, Badano L,
11.Hemkens LG, Ewald H, Gloy VL, Arpagaus A, Olu KK, Nidorf M, et al. Colchicine for prevention of cardiovascular events. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; (1):CD011047. doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD011047.pub2.
12.Lennerz C, Barman M, Tantawy M, Sopher M, Whittaker P. Colchicine for primary prevention of atrial fibrillation after
13.Masson W, Lobo M, Molinero G, Masson G,
14.Stewart S, Yang KCK, Atkins K, Dalbeth N, Robinson PC. Adverse events during oral colchicine use:a systematic review and
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA 39 |
Should Colchicine be used in the treatment of
APPENDICES
Appendix 1. Characteristics of Ongoing Clinical Trials
|
Clinical Trial ID |
|
Start & estimated |
|
|
|
|
No. |
Status |
primary |
Study design Country |
Population |
|||
/ Title |
|||||||
|
|
|
completion date |
|
|
|
|
1 |
The Greek |
Not yet |
06 April to 30 |
RCT |
Greece |
Adults with laboratory confirmed |
|
|
Study in the |
recruiting |
Sep 2020 |
Open label |
|
temperature >37.5 degrees centigrade AND at least two of: (1) |
|
|
Effects of |
|
|
|
|
sustained coughing, (2) sustained throat pain, (3) anosmia and/or |
|
|
Colchicine |
|
|
|
|
ageusia, (4) fatigue/tiredness, (5) PaO2<95 mmHg. |
|
|
in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
2 |
The ECLA |
Not yet |
March to 30 May |
RCT |
Canada |
Consented adults (age ≥18 years) |
|
|
PHRI |
recruiting |
2020 |
Open label |
|
admitted to hospital or already in hospital and |
|
|
COLCOVID |
|
|
|
|
fever (with or without at the time of randomization) and |
|
|
Trial |
|
|
|
|
SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) |
|
|
(COLCOVID) |
|
|
|
|
shortness of breath - (dyspnea) or image of typical or atypical |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pneumonia or oxygen desaturation (SpO2 ≤ 93) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Colchicine |
Not yet |
01 April to 30 |
RCT |
Italy |
Adults; |
|
|
Efficacy in |
recruiting |
May 2020 |
Open label |
|
According to the risk stratification criteria of the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region, Italy (accessed on March 24th, 2020 http://www...), eligible |
||
|
Pneumonia |
|
|
|
|
patients will belong to the Scenario 2, and 3a (slightly modified) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scenario 2 Positive nasopharyngeal swab for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
asymptomatic or paucisymptomatic, aged ≥70 years and/or with |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
clinical risk factors for poor outcome (clinically relevant chronic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lung disease, diabetes and/or heart disease) or - symptomatic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with respiratory or systemic symptoms, however clinically stable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(MEWS<3) with CT imaging showing viral pneumonia and positive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or pending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38°C and/or intensive cough, Respiratory rate < 25 /min, oxygen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
saturation (pulse oximetry) >95% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scenario 3 A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Positive swab for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- with respiratory and/or systemic symptoms and initial mild |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
respiratory failure e with objective signs of lung involvement; the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
patient is in stable conditions (MEWS < 3) Temperature>38°C and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or intensive cough, Respiratory rate ≥25 /min, or oxygen saturation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
4 |
Colchicine |
Recruiting |
23 March to |
RCT |
Canada |
Adults 40 years and older; |
|
|
Coronavirus |
|
September 2020 |
Single blind |
|
Received a diagnosis of |
|
|
SARS- |
|
|
(participant) |
|
Outpatient setting (not hospitalized); |
|
|
CoV2 Trial |
|
|
|
|
Must possess at least on of the following |
|
|
(COLCORONA) |
|
|
|
|
70 years or more of age, diabetes mellitus, uncontrolled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥150 mm Hg), known |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
respiratory disease (including asthma or chronic obstructive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pulmonary disease), known heart failure, known coronary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
disease, fever of ≥38.4°C within the last 48 hours, dyspnea |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at the time of presentation, bicytopenia, pancytopenia, or the |
combination of high neutrophil count and low lymphocyte count; Female patient is either not of childbearing potential, defined
as postmenopausal for at least 1 year or surgically sterile, or is of childbearing potential and practicing at least one method of contraception and preferably two complementary forms of contraception including a barrier method (e.g. male or female condoms, spermicides, sponges, foams, jellies, diaphragm, intrauterine device (IUD)) throughout the study and for 30 days after study completion;
Patient must be able and willing to comply with the requirements of this study protocol.
40 |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA |
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
Should Colchicine be used in the treatment of
Intervention Group(s) |
Comparison Group(s) |
Outcomes |
|
|
|
Standard treatment, |
CRP increase to 3 x upper limit of normal (Time Frame: 3 weeks) |
|
BID, on top of standard |
including all medications |
Time to increase in |
treatment |
recommended by the |
|
|
National Public Health |
Clinical deterioration in the semiquantitative ordinal scale suggested by the |
|
Organization |
WHO R&D committee (Time Frame: 3 weeks) |
|
|
Time to clinical deterioration (2 levels in the WHO R&D Blueprint scale) |
Local standard care plus colchicine with specific dosage schedule
Local standard of care for
Primary Outcome Measures:
Secondary Outcome Measures:
Composite of intubation for mechanical ventilation or death. (Time Frame: During hospitalization or until death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 30 days) Number of participants who require intubation for mechanical ventilation or die
Colchicine 1mg (or 0.5mg |
Standard of care for |
Primary Outcome Measures: |
in CKD)/day plus standard |
Clinical improvement (Time Frame: Day 28) |
|
care for |
|
- Time to clinical improvement: defined as time from randomization to an |
pneumonia |
|
improvement of two points from the status at randomization on a seven- |
|
|
category ordinary scale |
|
|
Hospital discharge (Time Frame: |
|
|
Day 28) |
|
|
- Live discharge from the hospital (whatever comes first) |
Secondary Outcome Measures:
Death (Time Frame: Day 28)
Clinical status (Time Frame: Day 4, 7, Day 14, Day 21) -
Mechanical ventilation (Time Frame: Day 28)
Hospitalization (Time Frame: Day 28)
Time from death (Time Frame: Day 28)
Negativization COVID 19 (Time Frame: Day 21)
-negativization of two consecutive
-Time to remission of fever in patients with T>37.5°C at enrollment
Colchicine 0.5mg twice daily for first 3 days and then once daily for the last 27 days
Placebo twice daily for the first 3 days and then once daily for the last 27 days
Primary Outcome Measures:
Number of participants who die or require hospitalization due to
The primary endpoint will be the composite of death or the need for hospitalization due to
Secondary Outcome Measures:
Number of participants who die (Time Frame: 30 days post randomization) The secondary endpoint is the occurrence of death in the 30 days following randomization.
Number of participants requiring hospitalization due to
The secondary endpoint is the need for hospitalization due to
Number of participants requiring mechanical ventilation (Time Frame: 30 days post randomization)
The secondary endpoint is the need for mechanical ventilation in the 30 days following randomization.
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA 41 |
Should Colchicine be used in the treatment of
Appendix 2. Literature search
Database |
Search strategy / search terms |
Medline |
“Coronavirus Infections"[Mesh]) OR "Coronavirus"[Mesh]) OR |
|
coronavirus) OR novel coronavirus) OR NCOV) OR |
|
[Supplementary Concept]) OR covid19) OR covid 19) OR |
|
"severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2" [Supplementary |
|
Concept]) OR severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) OR |
|
SARS2) OR SARS 2) OR SARS COV2) OR SARS COV 2) OR SARS- |
|
Date and time |
Results |
|
of search |
Yield |
Eligible |
01 April 2020 |
13 |
0 |
10:00:35 |
|
|
CENTRAL |
Colchicine [MeSH] AND Coronavirus [Mesh] |
01 April 2020 |
0 |
0 |
Google Scholar |
Colchicine AND |
01 April 2020 |
68 |
0 |
Trial Registries |
|
|
|
|
ClinicalTrials.gov |
01 April 2020 |
4 |
4 |
|
Chinese Clinical Trial Registry |
colchicine |
01 April 2020 |
0 |
0 |
42 |
ACTA MEDICA PHILIPPINA |
VOL. 54 NO. 1 SPECIAL ISSUE |